Indianapolis Fencing Club - Noblesville, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GERACI Paul A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 2 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 17% | |
| 3 | REED Dusty (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 25% | |
| 3 | KOENIGSKNECHT Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% | |
| 5 | PRIJATEL John R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 18% | |
| 6 | MAI Carl D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 7 | BUTTA Reese | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 8 | MILLER Hayden | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 9 | STOCK Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
| 10 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
| 11 | MACNEIL Matthew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 12 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% | |
| 13 | PLUMMER Ken | 100% | 93% | 33% | 4% | - | - | |
| 14 | MILLER Brent | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
| 15 | FULLER II Thomas | 100% | 100% | 89% | 46% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | MACNEIL Sydney | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 17 | MYERS Lewis | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 18 | DAVIS Daniel L. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 19 | MCNARY Ross | 100% | 96% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 20 | FAENOVA Alexandra | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 21 | STAUBITZ Marc | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 22 | AGRAWAL Krishna | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 23 | BUTTA Robert | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 24 | HARKNESS Luke | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 25 | DUTTON Kimberly | 100% | 15% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.