North Shore Fencers Club - Long Island, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | ZAGORUIKO Ivan | - | - | - | 2% | 39% | 58% |
| 2 | DOELEMAN Zeno | - | - | 1% | 9% | 48% | 43% |
| 3 | GRIFFITHS Ryan | - | - | - | 1% | 20% | 79% |
| 3 | KNOX James | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 56% |
| 5 | TSINIS Alex | - | - | - | 5% | 95% | |
| 6 | SVERDLOV Seth | - | - | 9% | 38% | 47% | 6% |
| 7 | KOEPPEL Levi | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 8 | ZHANG Jie | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 17% |
| 9 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 10 | DOUBOV Andrew | 1% | 10% | 34% | 43% | 12% | - |
| 11 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | - | - | 2% | 16% | 57% | 25% |
| 12 | KOKENGE Reid | - | - | 6% | 35% | 46% | 14% |
| 13 | CHANG Che | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 14 | XIA Dashan | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 49% | 16% |
| 15 | NORMILE Nicholas | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 16 | ZHAO kuncheng | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% |
| 17 | CHEN Leonardo | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 18 | FAICCO Joseph | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 11% |
| 19 | LIOU Solomon | - | - | 8% | 42% | 41% | 9% |
| 20 | LI Morgan | - | 9% | 42% | 41% | 8% | - |
| 20 | BOUDREAUX James | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 22 | HU Robert | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 23 | KRAVIT Connor | - | - | - | 10% | 41% | 49% |
| 24 | LI Jade | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | REPIC Oliver | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | CHEN Edward | 15% | 47% | 33% | 5% | - | - |
| 27 | SERAFIN Ben | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 20% |
| 28 | CHEIAN Dinis | - | - | 1% | 13% | 51% | 36% |
| 29 | NILSEN Mark | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | CAI Brian | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 31 | KARIMOV Amir | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 32 | WU Jerry | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 33 | ISAAC Joseph | - | - | - | 4% | 37% | 59% |
| 34 | WONG King-Yee | 4% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 35 | ACAR Devin | 15% | 47% | 32% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | LIN Nathan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 37 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | LIU Adam | - | 4% | 30% | 47% | 18% | 1% |
| 39 | BUACHIE Aaron | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 40 | NESTERCZUK Maddox | - | 9% | 41% | 41% | 8% | - |
| 41 | CHOI Joong Kyung | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% |
| 41 | LAU LUCAS | 24% | 55% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | ZENG Andrew | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 44 | TSE Maxwell | - | 7% | 35% | 55% | 2% | |
| 45 | RIM Eugene | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 46 | SUN Lucas | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 47 | NABAVI Matthew | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 47 | CHU Brandon | - | 7% | 42% | 40% | 10% | - |
| 49 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 50 | KYPRAIOS Nicholas | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 51 | GAO Victor | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 52 | CHEN Jayden | 8% | 36% | 45% | 11% | - | |
| 53 | RVACHEV Michael | 25% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
| 54 | LECUYER-SCHOONMAKER Declan | 10% | 41% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 11% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 55 | WONG Maximus | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 57 | YU Samuel | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 58 | FERRAIOLO James | 10% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 59 | ANDRUS Julien | 71% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | NG Nico | 31% | 45% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | CHEMAKIN Maxim | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 62 | KUSACTAY Eric | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | KOKENGE Chad | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 64 | ABEND James | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 66 | O'BRIEN Timothy | 11% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 66 | MOORE James | 56% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 68 | STEVENS Owen | 16% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | CHAU Collin | 45% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | SHAO Yuecheng | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 71 | LEE Elijah | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.