Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SANDERS Ian W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 42% |
2 | MELCHER Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | |
3 | WEISS Miles J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% |
3 | LONCAR Luka E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 31% | |
5 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
6 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% | 13% |
7 | DOELEMAN Zeno | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 11% | |
8 | HONDOR Robert D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 30% | |
9 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% |
10 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 7% |
11 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% | 3% | |
12 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 31% | 2% |
13 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
14 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% |
15 | HE Xiangrui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | 2% |
16 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 16% | 1% |
17 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
18 | BOUCHER Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
19 | GOODRICH Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% |
19 | MUNLIN Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
21 | PETROLL Jared P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 42% | |
22 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
23 | BRASSARD Calvin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
24 | HE Yurui | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 4% | - |
25 | WANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | |
26 | JONES Tristan Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | |
27 | PALLADINO Ben T. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
28 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
29 | RUSSELL Edward | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
30 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 1% |
31 | SONG Changze | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
32 | LEE Cayden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
33 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | |
34 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 5% | |
35 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
36 | SONG Troy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
37 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
38 | KENYON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
39 | PETERSEN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
40 | BUSH Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% | 13% | |
41 | ROSE-JONES Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 53% | |
42 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
43 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% | |
44 | WONG Maximus | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - | |
45 | PRIHODKO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 11% | |
46 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
46 | MARTINEAU ELIE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% | 10% |
48 | MALENFANT Vincent | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 20% |
49 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
50 | ZEBROSE Cordell B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 21% |
51 | JENNINGS Adin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 8% |
52 | LINSCOTT John J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 9% |
53 | TORRES Gianni | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - |
54 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% |
55 | STELTENKAMP Neal | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
56 | FAICCO Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 7% |
57 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
58 | ROGAK Benjamin A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | |
59 | JACOVINO Jonathan S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
60 | WANG Zichun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 38% | 5% | |
61 | SHREM Samuel G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% | 6% | |
62 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% | |
63 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 9% | |
64 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
65 | DOLMETSCH Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
66 | CHU Brandon A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
67 | GARCIA-CABRERA Jeffrey | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
68 | RAMIREZ CARDONA Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
69 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
70 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
71 | KABA Elias | 100% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
72 | SETO Jing | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 6% | |
73 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
74 | LARAGY Collin | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
75 | SHONEMAN Sam | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
76 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
77 | FEINBERG James Y. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
78 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 6% | - |
79 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | - |
80 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
81 | DOWD Peter L. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
81 | EMDEN André | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 6% |
83 | SMITH Troy H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | 1% |
83 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 96% | 68% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
85 | BYRON Max | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
86 | ERIKSEN Casey | 100% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
87 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 3% |
88 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
89 | PLOTNICHENKO Vsevolod | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
90 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 99% | 81% | 29% | 4% | - | |
91 | SPRINGER Elijah | 100% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
92 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 72% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
93 | WILSON Ian G. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% | |
94 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | |
95 | FENG Du | 100% | 100% | 91% | 51% | 3% | - | |
96 | SENERTH Ian J. | 100% | 98% | 74% | 24% | 3% | - | |
97 | KELLEY Hayden | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
98 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
99 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
100 | DU Yifan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
101 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 5% | - | - |
102 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | 99% | 84% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - |
102 | MANITT Philip | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
104 | MACKENZIE Delaney | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
105 | MICKEY Christopher J. | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
105 | MORI Seneca | 100% | 95% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
107 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
107 | GREEN Logan | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
107 | BUMPUS Isaias | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
110 | SMALL Brayden | 100% | 62% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
111 | BAZZANA Beniamino | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
112 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 4% | - |
113 | SHAPIRO Natan | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
114 | PAYNE Massimo | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 1% | |
115 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | |
116 | WANG Xiangdong | 100% | 96% | 70% | 24% | 2% | - | |
117 | LI Ray | 100% | 67% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
117 | WANG Zhenhai | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
119 | HANNA Alexander | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
119 | MEN Junda | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% | 1% | |
121 | ROBINSON Garrett | 100% | 86% | 39% | 6% | - | - | |
122 | PEARSALL Riley C. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 46% | 6% | - | |
123 | REELS Eric J. | 100% | 81% | 35% | 6% | - | - | |
123 | GREGORY Nova | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 31% | 3% | |
125 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 100% | 97% | 69% | 20% | 1% | - | |
126 | LAW Oliver | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
127 | HOWARD Jackson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
128 | ZELIN Sam J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
129 | JESSER Daxton | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
130 | O'BRIEN Eamon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - |
131 | MARSHALL William L. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
132 | MARTONE Matt L. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
133 | STEIN Philip | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
134 | SONG Ryan | 100% | 87% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
135 | LIN Lucas | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
136 | LIN Yufei | 100% | 76% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
136 | HEISLER Maxfield | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
138 | ALVES PEREIRA Francisco Xavier | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
139 | BERLET Bobby F. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
139 | GU Eric | 100% | 75% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
139 | NGUYEN Trung | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
142 | WENGER Caleb | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
143 | KAIN Brad | 100% | 92% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
144 | LIU Kun | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
145 | BRUEGGEMANN Max | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
146 | CULLER Michael (Mike) D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
147 | HOWLETT Daniel | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
148 | BARRETT Jon | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
149 | PIERINI Noah | 100% | 96% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | |
150 | OSHIMA Robert | 100% | 65% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
150 | PARIGIAN Alexander | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
150 | LIBERT Zachariah | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
153 | CONNER James | 100% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
154 | PAPSUN Benjamin J. | 100% | 89% | 39% | 6% | - | - | |
155 | MURRAY John P. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
156 | MASSE Dean | 100% | 87% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
157 | BENNETT Paul | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
158 | LOWE Connor | 100% | 95% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.