Brooklyn, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAZUR Daniil | - | - | 7% | 71% | 22% | ||
| 2 | SIMMONS Ariel (Ari) J. | - | - | - | - | 14% | 51% | 35% |
| 3 | ZIEGLER John | - | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 4 | ALIMOV fayzulla | - | - | - | - | 1% | 25% | 75% |
| 5 | LAI Boden | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% | |
| 6 | IARIKOV Nicholas | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 7 | NAKAS Levent | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 8 | MIDYANY Evan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 9 | HORVATH Adam | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 10 | ATKINS Levi H. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
| 11 | KATS Dylan G. | - | - | - | - | 10% | 70% | 20% |
| 12 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 46% | 21% |
| 13 | KIM Henry | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 42% | 13% | |
| 14 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 23% | |
| 15 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 3% | |
| 16 | KUGLER Luke | - | - | 7% | 32% | 45% | 15% | |
| 17 | PROFIS Liora | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | ||
| 18 | CUMMINGS Owen | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | 1% | - |
| 19 | LEE Claire | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 20 | ZHANG Jason | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 21 | SAVORETTI Francesco | - | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 22 | HELMY Richard | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | MIDYANY Ryan | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 24 | HORVATH Mark | - | - | 5% | 28% | 46% | 20% | |
| 25 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | - | |
| 26 | BRODSKY Julian | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
| 27 | CHEN Bailey | 1% | 14% | 59% | 24% | 2% | ||
| 28 | LIU Andrew | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 29 | NOLAN Tyler | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 30 | SOLARZ Arthur | 26% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - | ||
| 31 | PETROFF Eva | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | 4% | 28% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | AI Amy | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | ZHAO Pierce | 5% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | LI Caroline | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 35 | AU Joshua | 5% | 28% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | 1% | 5% | 17% | 30% | 29% | 15% | 3% |
| 38 | SAVORETTI Pietro | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 23% | 3% | |
| 39 | STERN Savannah | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
| 40 | STEVENS Owen | 17% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 31% | 2% | - |
| 42 | WONG Alexander | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | COHEN Henry | 1% | 14% | 45% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LEE Henry | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LORENZ Nathan | 18% | 54% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | ERISMAN Gabriella | 24% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | - |
| 48 | DAVIS John "Jack" | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 49 | SPILLER Hiro | 50% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | TING Evelyn | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 51 | MECHREFE Anthony | 45% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | ALEXANDER Christopher | 10% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | LIN Jerry | 55% | 40% | 5% | - | - | ||
| 54 | FUNATOMI Maya | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | SONG Charlotte | 19% | 49% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 55 | DUNMALL James | 3% | 43% | 40% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | GOLIYAD Lisa | 15% | 51% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | WANG Zhaoyuan | 62% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.