Brooklyn, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAZUR Daniil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 22% | ||
| 2 | SIMMONS Ariel (Ari) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 86% | 35% |
| 3 | ZIEGLER John | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 4 | ALIMOV fayzulla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 75% |
| 5 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% | |
| 6 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% |
| 7 | NAKAS Levent | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
| 8 | MIDYANY Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 9 | HORVATH Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% |
| 10 | ATKINS Levi H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 11 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 20% |
| 12 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 21% |
| 13 | KIM Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 13% | |
| 14 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 23% | |
| 15 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 3% | |
| 16 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 15% | |
| 17 | PROFIS Liora | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | ||
| 18 | CUMMINGS Owen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | 1% | - |
| 19 | LEE Claire | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 20 | ZHANG Jason | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 21 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 22 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | MIDYANY Ryan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 24 | HORVATH Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 20% | |
| 25 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 26 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
| 27 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 99% | 85% | 26% | 2% | ||
| 28 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | NOLAN Tyler | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 30 | SOLARZ Arthur | 100% | 74% | 19% | 2% | - | ||
| 31 | PETROFF Eva | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | 100% | 96% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | AI Amy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | ZHAO Pierce | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | LI Caroline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 35 | AU Joshua | 100% | 95% | 67% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 48% | 19% | 3% |
| 38 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 3% | |
| 39 | STERN Savannah | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 40 | STEVENS Owen | 100% | 83% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% | 2% | - |
| 42 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 95% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | COHEN Henry | 100% | 99% | 85% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LEE Henry | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LORENZ Nathan | 100% | 82% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | ERISMAN Gabriella | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | - |
| 48 | DAVIS John "Jack" | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 49 | SPILLER Hiro | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | TING Evelyn | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 51 | MECHREFE Anthony | 100% | 55% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | ALEXANDER Christopher | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | LIN Jerry | 100% | 45% | 6% | - | - | ||
| 54 | FUNATOMI Maya | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | SONG Charlotte | 100% | 81% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 55 | DUNMALL James | 100% | 97% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | GOLIYAD Lisa | 100% | 85% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | WANG Zhaoyuan | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.