Freehold Fencing Academy - Freehold, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
| 2 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% |
| 3 | WICAS Graham E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% | |
| 3 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 5 | SERAFIN Ben | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 6 | WU Matthew | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 7 | KOEPPEL Levi E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 11% | |
| 8 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | 97% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 9 | TATE William Isom | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 10 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% |
| 11 | ANAFI Ari | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 12 | SHREM Samuel G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | 6% | |
| 13 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 99% | 87% | 32% | 4% | - | |
| 14 | LIOU Solomon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 52% | 9% | |
| 15 | WU Michelle | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 16 | LIN Qianzhong | 100% | 55% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 17 | ZHAO Kuncheng | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 18 | ANDERSON Riley | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 19 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 20 | KRISHNAN Skanda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
| 21 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 22 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 23 | MATTO Edward J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 24 | BASSINDER Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 24% |
| 25 | SHAFAIE Ali | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 26 | BUACHIE Aaron | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | EVANS Joseph | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | CHOI Paul S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 29 | LI Morgan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 30 | LUM-DEBONO Adam | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | COETZEE Frans M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 32 | MARRAN John | 100% | 60% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | WU Jerry | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | CHEN Raymond | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 35 | WU Pingchien | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 36 | LIU Kun | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LEE Kevin | 100% | 67% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 38 | SHABALIN Nikita | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | PONDACO Frankee | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.