Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YIP Allison | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 2 | XU Aasta | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
| 3 | WANG Nicole | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 3 | SUN Joanna | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% | |
| 5 | ARNOLD Evangeline | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% |
| 6 | KOU Cynthia | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 63% | 4% |
| 7 | MIAO Anthea | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 3% |
| 8 | LIAO irene | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% | |
| 9 | LYNTON Olivia | - | 2% | 17% | 50% | 29% | 2% | |
| 10 | LU Chu | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 11 | WANG Phoebe | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 6% |
| 12 | ZHAO Ellie | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% | |
| 13 | STEPHAN Antje Elisa | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 14 | DEJOY Leilah | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 15 | PARKE Jaime | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | HERNASA Elsa | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 17 | VOO Evelyn | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% |
| 18 | RONG Hilary | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 46% | 13% |
| 19 | LYNTON Alexandra | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 3% |
| 20 | YU Jiaming | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
| 21 | YANG Nina | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 22 | KWAK Olivia | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 23 | XIE Zhiran (Celine) | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 24 | LEE Rebecca | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 25 | MARTYNOVA Veronica | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | MA Sloane | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | LI zoey | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 28 | TOYOFUKU Evelyn | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | - | - |
| 29 | WANG Kercedes Ye | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 30 | MENDIRATTA Olivia | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | TRUONG Chloe | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 32 | HAN Jimin Ellin | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 50% | 12% | |
| 33 | LI Celine | 4% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 34 | CHONG Emma | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 35 | KUSHNERENKO Maiia | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | MUHLENBRUCH Cora | 5% | 29% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | KEDAN Carmella | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | LIU Aubrey | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | SCHWARTZMAN Avital | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | LEE Layla | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | YAO Astrid | 52% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | YU Elise | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | LUO Xinyue | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | MUKKU Emily | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% |
| 45 | GUO Cecilia | 5% | 29% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | WANG Olivia | 1% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | LA Evelyn | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 48 | FLESHER Mia | 8% | 40% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | PUTTAMRAJU Nithya | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 50 | WANG Elizabeth | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 51 | YE Charlotte | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | YANG Emma | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 53 | KANE Sloan | - | < 1% | 2% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 8% |
| 54 | SHIH Eva | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | HWANG Faith Lael | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 56 | CHU Brianna | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 57 | SUN Annika | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | HONG Ellie | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | SHIH Cayla | 15% | 43% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.