Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Jaden | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
2 | WEI Winston | - | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
3 | ONG Nicholas | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% |
3 | MURDOCK Koichi | - | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 8% |
5 | JACOB Ezra | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
6 | TANG Brayden | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
7 | WANG Waylon | - | 1% | 14% | 43% | 34% | 8% | |
8 | LEONG Wilson Hua | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 3% |
9 | BIELER Mason | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 84% |
10 | YEE Colin | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
11 | HUANG Nathan | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 35% | 4% |
12 | YANG Charles | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
13 | GUO Joey | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 9% |
14 | WANG sicheng | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 44% | 16% |
15 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 50% |
16 | CROWDER Job christoph | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 25% | 4% |
17 | HE Ian | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
18 | SANCHEZ MARTINEZ Victor Noel | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
19 | GUO Austin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 19% |
20 | XU Ryan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 51% | 6% |
21 | LIU Aiden | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
22 | FOO Kingston | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | - |
23 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
23 | XU Ethan | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% | |
25 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 15% | ||
26 | ZHANG Yankai | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% | ||
27 | LI Aaron | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
28 | EVANS Desmond | - | - | - | 7% | 32% | 47% | 15% |
29 | DING Sam | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | |
30 | DOUGLASS Liam | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% | |
31 | YANG Steve | - | - | 6% | 29% | 46% | 19% | |
32 | YUNG Brandon | - | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
33 | AGARWAL Jagrav | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% | - |
34 | MAO Runxian | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
35 | DULAI Agam | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - |
36 | MA Justin | 1% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
37 | ULZIIBOLD Sean | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
38 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
39 | ALCAZAREN Cian | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 7% | |
40 | PICACHE Crockett | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
41 | CHEUNG Henry | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
42 | WANG Eason | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
43 | HAGIWARA-MATIASEK Kazuma | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
44 | SHENOY Neil | 1% | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
45 | JUNG Aaron | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
46 | FALCONE Mateo | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
47 | CREMEL Remi | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 8% | ||
48 | NGUYEN Norris | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
49 | LIN Sampson | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
50 | PARK Kaiden | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
51 | SINGH Reyaansh | 2% | 20% | 48% | 25% | 5% | - | |
52 | SCHOR William | 46% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
53 | LI Jake | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
54 | PARKS Maxwell | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
55 | WONG Connor | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
56 | SEUL Maddox | 2% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
57 | LEE Ian | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
58 | HO Cameron | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 2% | - |
59 | SHAW Eames | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
60 | LEE Colin | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | ||
61 | LI Lief | 22% | 46% | 27% | 6% | - | ||
62 | CHENG Alvin | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | |
63 | GU Evan | 3% | 29% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | |
64 | TAN Benjamin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
65 | NGUYEN Nolan | 23% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
66 | LIU Landon | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
67 | ZHANG Yuen | 44% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
68 | TEJAKUSUMA Eric | 6% | 40% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
69 | LITVACK Jackson | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
70 | GOURLEY Jack | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
71 | WARD MADS | 9% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
72 | GOYAL Arie | 12% | 44% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
73 | LIN Dylan | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
74 | ROCHKIND Ethan | 3% | 29% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
74 | SURIANO Dominic | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
76 | LO Enzo | < 1% | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
77 | CABATO Luca | 25% | 52% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
78 | BHANGOO Arman | 25% | 45% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
79 | LE Oliver | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | |
80 | LUO Derren | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
81 | TRAN Andrew | 2% | 13% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
82 | KIM Noah | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
83 | ROLON Maximiliano | 57% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
84 | LU David | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
85 | WANG Andy | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.