Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | ||
| 2 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% |
| 3 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 28% | |
| 3 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | |
| 5 | QU Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 65% | ||
| 6 | HU Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 33% | |
| 7 | ROPER Griffin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | 3% | |
| 9 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% |
| 10 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 11% |
| 11 | ZHAO David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 2% |
| 12 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | 16% | ||
| 13 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 14 | TIAN Andy | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 8% | ||
| 15 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
| 16 | WU Yulen | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | BRADY David | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | - | |
| 18 | HAN Jiaren | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 20 | SHARMA Ari | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | ||
| 21 | LI Andrew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
| 22 | ZHENG Vincent | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 23 | XIONG Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 24 | PELLERIN Liam | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | DAVE Neil | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | CHEN Keegan | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | ||
| 27 | XIA Wenhao | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 15% | 1% | |
| 28 | GENG Vincent | 100% | 98% | 77% | 24% | 2% | ||
| 29 | LU Ethan | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | TARDIFF Owen | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | DENG Jonathan | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | ||
| 32 | LIU KUNDE | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | WANG Grant | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 34 | LIU Brady | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | LI Ethan | 100% | 58% | 10% | - | - | ||
| 36 | CRIUCOV Daniel | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | BHOSREKAR Som | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | HU Hudson | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | LIU KELVIN | 100% | 78% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 41 | YANG Mark | 100% | 67% | 17% | 1% | - | ||
| 42 | CUI Jason | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | SAVIR Ethan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 44 | RENSHAW Hunter | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.