Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ABUELFUTUH Sama | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 82% |
2 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
3 | NGUYEN Renee | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
3 | CHI Zoe | - | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 37% | 7% |
5 | XIONG Alice | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
6 | ZHAO Isabel | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
7 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 3% |
8 | LEE Kaitlyn | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
9 | SONG Sunny | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
10 | WANG Chantal | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
11 | YOUN Kylie | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
12 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
13 | LI Ariel | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
14 | CHOI Lydia | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
15 | ARNOLD Evangeline | 1% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
16 | MOHAN Riya | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
17 | SUN Joanna | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
18 | SUN Milly | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
19 | WANG Olivia | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 1% |
20 | KARTHIK Diya | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
21 | DU Chloe | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
22 | MAENG Gloria | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
23 | CHEN Stephanie | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
24 | WANG Yvonne | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
25 | DAI Sophie | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
26 | LI Katherine | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
27 | SRIVASTAVA Aria | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
28 | VINLUAN Emma | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
29 | YANG Arianna | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
30 | DU Chelsea | 4% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
31 | TRIVULCE Scarlett | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
32 | WANG Kercedes Ye | 44% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
33 | PARKE Jaime | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
34 | YOON Claire | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
35 | HALLENBECK Felicity | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
36 | DEJOY Leilah | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
37 | ZHANG Carina | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
38 | PAN Zoe | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
39 | BERESTOVITSKY Eva | 14% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
40 | LIU Emma | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
41 | REN Harper | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
42 | MIXON Ivory | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.