Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% |
| 2 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 3 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% |
| 3 | ZHAO kuncheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% |
| 5 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 6 | GAO Victor | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 7 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 8 | DURKIN Hudson | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | MANN Jake R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
| 10 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 11 | KIM Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 25% | |
| 12 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 12% |
| 13 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 11% |
| 14 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 15 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 12% |
| 16 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 19% | 2% |
| 17 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 25% |
| 18 | CHEN Edward | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | - |
| 19 | LYCHKO Maksym | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 20 | NG Nico | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 21 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 22 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% | |
| 23 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | HEGLAND Grady | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | MORI Seneca | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 27 | LI Morgan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 28 | FENG Du | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 29 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 32 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% |
| 34 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | NG Rygel | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 37 | ZHAI Junqi | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 38 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 39 | KIM Zac | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | THOMAS Ethan | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | GOVOROV Alexander | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | KAPLAN Maddox | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LI Ryan | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 45 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 46 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | WU Jerry | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 48 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | CHAU Collin | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | LIU George | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | AGUIRRE Pablo | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | WANG Xiangdong | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 4% | |
| 53 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | LI Ray | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | DU Yifan | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | SALZBERG Austin | 100% | 97% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 58 | EVANS Joseph | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 59 | XIE Richard | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | MUNFORD Malik | 100% | 93% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | HIGGINS Viktor | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.