Premier Challenge ROC/RJCC/RYC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Saturday, September 27, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 YANG David H. - - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
2 KIM Daniel - - 6% 23% 37% 27% 7%
3 WEI JR Shan - - - 5% 24% 46% 25%
3 KO Caleb - - - 1% 9% 36% 53%
5 ZHANG Hanru - - - 2% 12% 40% 47%
6 ZHAI Derrick - - 4% 33% 63%
6 XIAN kevin - - - 4% 27% 69%
8 JIN Andy - - - 2% 14% 41% 42%
9 CHANG Parker - - - 3% 17% 43% 36%
10 PLUMMER Waylon - - 3% 17% 43% 37%
11 WANG Mendy - - - 3% 20% 46% 31%
11 SHOU Raymond - 1% 7% 25% 40% 23% 4%
13 WANG Luke - 1% 6% 20% 36% 29% 8%
14 KINGSLEY Griffin - - 1% 9% 29% 40% 20%
15 SONG Enoch - 5% 20% 36% 30% 8%
16 WANG Joshua 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
17 CHOI Hunter 2% 15% 38% 35% 10%
18 OH Joshua - - 3% 14% 35% 38% 11%
19 QIAN Will - - 3% 15% 35% 35% 12%
20 SAMUEL Lucas - 3% 22% 56% 19%
21 TANG Michael 1% 11% 33% 38% 15% 1%
22 LEONG Samuel 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 4%
23 SUSANTO William - - 4% 18% 42% 36%
24 WU Wallace - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
25 KUO Phineas - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 19%
26 XU Ryan - 1% 6% 22% 39% 28% 5%
27 BAS Jonathan - 2% 14% 33% 35% 14% 2%
28 CHITADZE Lazare - - 2% 12% 34% 41% 11%
29 ZHENG Austin - 1% 5% 20% 37% 29% 8%
30 KEEGAN Cole - 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
31 NABASSOUA Djibril - 1% 9% 30% 43% 17%
31 CAO Aaron 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 4%
33 ZHONG Kingsley - 5% 20% 37% 29% 8% 1%
34 BEYDOUN Sam 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 6%
35 CAO Joshua - 1% 9% 28% 40% 22%
36 BRADFORD-WATT Ezra 3% 19% 35% 29% 11% 2% -
37 ULYSSE Jacob - 1% 6% 22% 39% 27% 5%
38 BRILLANTES Luke - 1% 12% 32% 35% 17% 3%
39 AHMAD Uzayr - 1% 9% 29% 40% 18% 3%
39 CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander 6% 28% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
41 KUPERBERG Thomas - 5% 18% 34% 30% 11% 1%
42 DAVE Neil 18% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
43 HUYNH Kaleb - 2% 15% 40% 38% 5%
44 AMR HOSSNY Adam 1% 9% 30% 37% 20% 3%
45 LI Andrew 5% 23% 39% 26% 7% 1%
46 WANG Jaaziel 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 7% 1%
47 LEVKOVICH Avery 4% 26% 39% 23% 6% 1% -
48 HU Michael - 1% 6% 23% 38% 26% 5%
48 PLOSSER Charlie 1% 12% 32% 34% 17% 4% -
50 MA Matthew - 6% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1%
51 GRIGORIEV Michael - 4% 21% 44% 31%
52 DENG Jonathan 5% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
53 ZHANG Ethan - 4% 18% 37% 30% 9% 1%
54 LEE Kyle 4% 24% 39% 26% 6% 1%
55 MCCORMICK Chase 39% 47% 14% 1% -
56 LEE Thomas - - 6% 24% 37% 26% 6%
57 XIA Vincent - 6% 24% 38% 25% 6% 1%
58 LEE Aeden 3% 18% 36% 30% 12% 2% -
59 LIN John - 3% 14% 33% 34% 14% 2%
60 GOLI Arush 3% 17% 37% 31% 11% 1% -
61 HUANG Dalynn 2% 14% 38% 36% 11%
62 MOON Nolan 8% 29% 36% 21% 5% -
63 GUGALA Frank 4% 22% 39% 28% 8% 1%
64 KOO Jaeha 42% 41% 15% 2% - - -
65 CHEN Kevin 12% 37% 35% 14% 2% - -
66 WU Max 17% 43% 31% 8% 1%
67 DAWSON Myer 2% 16% 35% 31% 13% 2% -
68 LIU jeremy 6% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1%
69 ALABI Adriel 5% 27% 41% 23% 4% -
71 HUANG Marcus 11% 34% 36% 16% 3% - -
72 KIM Albert 17% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
73 SHEN Lucas 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2% -
74 YEUNG rex 36% 42% 19% 4% - - -
75 MONDESIR Chace 3% 19% 38% 29% 10% 1% -
76 BRADY David 35% 44% 18% 3% -
77 ZHANG Vincent J 5% 27% 39% 23% 6% -
78 FOMIN Dash 17% 41% 32% 10% 1% -
79 CHENG Karter 4% 28% 51% 16% 1%
80 MAN Dylan 36% 42% 18% 3% - -
81 XU Jaden 30% 50% 18% 1% -
82 CHONG Cooper 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
83 SIELSKI Evan 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2% -
83 LEE Ryan 30% 43% 22% 5% - - -
85 DEGRYSE Leopold 20% 51% 24% 5% - - -
86 VAN DER HARTEN Lukas 53% 39% 7% 1% - - -
87 DING Jacob 2% 15% 34% 32% 14% 3% -
88 XU Jonathan 6% 28% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
89 DAVIDSON Henry 22% 40% 28% 9% 1% -
90 MOORE Quinn 5% 23% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
91 RAJAT Rivaan 52% 37% 10% 1% - -
91 BHATTACHARYA Dhruv 24% 43% 26% 6% 1% -
93 SONG Tristan 58% 34% 7% 1% - - -
94 LEONG Michael 17% 38% 32% 11% 2% - -
94 WEBSTER Rowan 44% 40% 13% 2% - - -
96 PARISH-MORRIS Jay 2% 16% 36% 32% 11% 1% -
97 TAN Winston 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% -
98 DOERR Alexander 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 5% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.