Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YANG David H. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
2 | KIM Daniel | - | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
3 | WEI JR Shan | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% |
3 | KO Caleb | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
5 | ZHANG Hanru | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
6 | ZHAI Derrick | - | - | 4% | 33% | 63% | ||
6 | XIAN kevin | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% | |
8 | JIN Andy | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
9 | CHANG Parker | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% |
10 | PLUMMER Waylon | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
11 | WANG Mendy | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 31% |
11 | SHOU Raymond | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
13 | WANG Luke | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
14 | KINGSLEY Griffin | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
15 | SONG Enoch | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% | |
16 | WANG Joshua | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
17 | CHOI Hunter | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% | ||
18 | OH Joshua | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 38% | 11% |
19 | QIAN Will | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
20 | SAMUEL Lucas | - | 3% | 22% | 56% | 19% | ||
21 | TANG Michael | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 1% | |
22 | LEONG Samuel | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
23 | SUSANTO William | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
24 | WU Wallace | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
25 | KUO Phineas | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
26 | XU Ryan | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 5% |
27 | BAS Jonathan | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
28 | CHITADZE Lazare | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 41% | 11% |
29 | ZHENG Austin | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
30 | KEEGAN Cole | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
31 | NABASSOUA Djibril | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% | |
31 | CAO Aaron | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
33 | ZHONG Kingsley | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
34 | BEYDOUN Sam | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
35 | CAO Joshua | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
36 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
37 | ULYSSE Jacob | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
38 | BRILLANTES Luke | - | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
39 | AHMAD Uzayr | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 18% | 3% |
39 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | KUPERBERG Thomas | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
42 | DAVE Neil | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
43 | HUYNH Kaleb | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 38% | 5% | |
44 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
45 | LI Andrew | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
46 | WANG Jaaziel | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
47 | LEVKOVICH Avery | 4% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
48 | HU Michael | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
48 | PLOSSER Charlie | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
50 | MA Matthew | - | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
51 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | ||
52 | DENG Jonathan | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
53 | ZHANG Ethan | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
54 | LEE Kyle | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
55 | MCCORMICK Chase | 39% | 47% | 14% | 1% | - | ||
56 | LEE Thomas | - | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
57 | XIA Vincent | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
58 | LEE Aeden | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
59 | LIN John | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
60 | GOLI Arush | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
61 | HUANG Dalynn | 2% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 11% | ||
62 | MOON Nolan | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | |
63 | GUGALA Frank | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
64 | KOO Jaeha | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
65 | CHEN Kevin | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
66 | WU Max | 17% | 43% | 31% | 8% | 1% | ||
67 | DAWSON Myer | 2% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
68 | LIU jeremy | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
69 | ALABI Adriel | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - | |
71 | HUANG Marcus | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
72 | KIM Albert | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
73 | SHEN Lucas | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
74 | YEUNG rex | 36% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
75 | MONDESIR Chace | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
76 | BRADY David | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | ||
77 | ZHANG Vincent J | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - | |
78 | FOMIN Dash | 17% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
79 | CHENG Karter | 4% | 28% | 51% | 16% | 1% | ||
80 | MAN Dylan | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
81 | XU Jaden | 30% | 50% | 18% | 1% | - | ||
82 | CHONG Cooper | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
83 | SIELSKI Evan | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
83 | LEE Ryan | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
85 | DEGRYSE Leopold | 20% | 51% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
86 | VAN DER HARTEN Lukas | 53% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
87 | DING Jacob | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
88 | XU Jonathan | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
89 | DAVIDSON Henry | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
90 | MOORE Quinn | 5% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
91 | RAJAT Rivaan | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
91 | BHATTACHARYA Dhruv | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
93 | SONG Tristan | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
94 | LEONG Michael | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
94 | WEBSTER Rowan | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
96 | PARISH-MORRIS Jay | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
97 | TAN Winston | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
98 | DOERR Alexander | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.