Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YANG David H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
2 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
3 | WEI JR Shan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% |
3 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
5 | ZHANG Hanru | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
6 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 63% | ||
6 | XIAN kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | |
8 | JIN Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
9 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% |
10 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
11 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 31% |
11 | SHOU Raymond | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
13 | WANG Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
14 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
15 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 8% | |
16 | WANG Joshua | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
17 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 10% | ||
18 | OH Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
19 | QIAN Will | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
20 | SAMUEL Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 19% | ||
21 | TANG Michael | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 1% | |
22 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
23 | SUSANTO William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
24 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
25 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% |
26 | XU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 5% |
27 | BAS Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
28 | CHITADZE Lazare | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 11% |
29 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
30 | KEEGAN Cole | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
31 | NABASSOUA Djibril | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% | |
31 | CAO Aaron | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
33 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
34 | BEYDOUN Sam | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
35 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 22% | |
36 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
37 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
38 | BRILLANTES Luke | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
39 | AHMAD Uzayr | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | 3% |
39 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | KUPERBERG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
42 | DAVE Neil | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
43 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 5% | |
44 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
45 | LI Andrew | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
46 | WANG Jaaziel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
47 | LEVKOVICH Avery | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | HU Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
48 | PLOSSER Charlie | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
50 | MA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
51 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | ||
52 | DENG Jonathan | 100% | 95% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
53 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
54 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
55 | MCCORMICK Chase | 100% | 61% | 15% | 1% | - | ||
56 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
57 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
58 | LEE Aeden | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
59 | LIN John | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
60 | GOLI Arush | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
61 | HUANG Dalynn | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | ||
62 | MOON Nolan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
63 | GUGALA Frank | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
64 | KOO Jaeha | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
65 | CHEN Kevin | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
66 | WU Max | 100% | 83% | 40% | 9% | 1% | ||
67 | DAWSON Myer | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
68 | LIU jeremy | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
69 | ALABI Adriel | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | |
71 | HUANG Marcus | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
72 | KIM Albert | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
73 | SHEN Lucas | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
74 | YEUNG rex | 100% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
75 | MONDESIR Chace | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - |
76 | BRADY David | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | ||
77 | ZHANG Vincent J | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
78 | FOMIN Dash | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
79 | CHENG Karter | 100% | 96% | 68% | 17% | 1% | ||
80 | MAN Dylan | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
81 | XU Jaden | 100% | 70% | 20% | 1% | - | ||
82 | CHONG Cooper | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
83 | SIELSKI Evan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
83 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
85 | DEGRYSE Leopold | 100% | 80% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
86 | VAN DER HARTEN Lukas | 100% | 47% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
87 | DING Jacob | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
88 | XU Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
89 | DAVIDSON Henry | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
90 | MOORE Quinn | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
91 | RAJAT Rivaan | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
91 | BHATTACHARYA Dhruv | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
93 | SONG Tristan | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
94 | LEONG Michael | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
94 | WEBSTER Rowan | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
96 | PARISH-MORRIS Jay | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
97 | TAN Winston | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 7% | - |
98 | DOERR Alexander | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.