Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHAI Derrick | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
| 2 | CHANG Parker | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% | |
| 3 | WANG Mendy | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% | |
| 3 | SONG Enoch | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 27% | |
| 5 | XIAN kevin | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 79% |
| 6 | ZHAI Alex | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 7 | ZHONG Kingsley | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 4% |
| 8 | WU Wallace | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 9 | SHOU Raymond | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 57% | |
| 9 | CAO Joshua | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 12 | MOON Nolan | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 3% | |
| 13 | WANG Jaaziel | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 14 | GUGALA Frank | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 2% |
| 15 | HU Michael | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 29% | |
| 16 | HUYNH Kaleb | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 17 | HUANG Dalynn | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 18 | LIN Lucas | - | - | 6% | 28% | 50% | 17% | |
| 19 | WU Max | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 20 | MAN Dylan | 2% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | - | |
| 21 | YANG Luca | - | - | 4% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
| 22 | SHEN Lucas | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | WU Yulen | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 24 | CHAE Emmett | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 13% | 1% | |
| 25 | LI Andrew | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 3% |
| 26 | CHONG Cooper | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | - | |
| 27 | CAO Aaron | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 15% | |
| 28 | BRADY David | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | YANG Crescent | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | MOORE Quinn | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | TARDIFF Owen | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 2% | |
| 32 | MONDESIR Chace | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 33 | XU Jonathan | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 34 | DENG Jonathan | - | 6% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 3% | |
| 35 | FOMIN Dash | 5% | 35% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 48% | 9% | |
| 37 | YOON Mason | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 38 | LI Ethan | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | LEE Ryan | 12% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | BHOSREKAR Som | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | GOLDSTEIN Tate | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | DING Jacob | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
| 44 | SAVIR Ethan | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 44 | LEVKOVICH Milan | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | XIE zhouhan | 24% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 47 | POLEBOYINA Aarav | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | YU Adam | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | - |
| 49 | JIANG Ethan | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | CAI daniel | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | STABROWSKI Joaquin | 3% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 52 | RAY William | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 53 | KIM ISAAC | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | ZUO Yizhi | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 55 | CHEUNG Zachary | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | SALERNO A.J. | 5% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 57 | MOSAMEH Faraj | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 58 | DAVE Neil | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 59 | WU Connor | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 60 | LIN Alexander | 18% | 44% | 30% | 7% | - | - | |
| 61 | MILLER Julian | 1% | 35% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | KIM JOSHUA | 25% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 63 | PELLERIN Liam | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 64 | CAI Charlie | 4% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 65 | MONTGOMERY Henry | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 66 | AWALGAONKAR Aahan | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.