Canlan Sports - Libertyville - Libertyville, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
2 | SINAI Nathan G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
3 | KARNAS Karol | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 23% |
3 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 35% |
5 | SPIER Julian H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 46% |
6 | ZIEGLER John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% |
7 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
8 | NOWAK Jakub P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 35% |
9 | RADENOVIC Vukan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
10 | ZHENG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
11 | POULIQUEN Nicolas J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% |
12 | LOISEAU Oscar | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
13 | HEIM Bryce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
14 | SUVOROV Yuly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
15 | BAGDONAS Olivier | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
16 | RIECK Brennan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
17 | CONKLIN Jim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% |
18 | CAMP Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% |
19 | WILLIAMS Logan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
20 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
21 | COLEMAN Ian | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
22 | THOMAS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 57% | 14% |
23 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
24 | CHARETTE Matthew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
25 | JONES Reilly | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
26 | MCDOWELL Will | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
27 | HUANG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
28 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
29 | CURTY Jack | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
30 | GLEN Ethan | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
31 | RICHARDSON Ray | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | KRAJ Pawel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 2% |
33 | TOPAZ Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
34 | KTSANES Charlie | 100% | 93% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | < 1% |
35 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
36 | SNYDER Alex | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
37 | WANG Kaiyan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
38 | KOENIGSKNECHT Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 8% |
39 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 2% |
40 | FELICIANO Damien | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
41 | CANCELO Jose | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
42 | ROSADO Balthazar Francisco | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
43 | LIMER Avi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
44 | HONG Daniel | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
44 | SORRENTINO Salvatore | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
46 | DU Yifan | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | < 1% | - | - |
47 | DRAWZ Chase | 100% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
48 | BAMPTON Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
49 | BROCK Joshua | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
50 | SAWYER Bryan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
51 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
52 | BISSEN Quinn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
53 | ROWLAND Marsden | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
54 | FORTUNA Chase | 100% | 95% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
55 | SHOEMAKER Oliver | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
56 | VARNEY Douglas W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
57 | HERRERA Xavier | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
58 | BEACH John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
59 | WEAVER Edward | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
60 | OBERLY Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | 1% |
61 | BAGAMANOV Ruslan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
62 | SWENSON Diego | 100% | 83% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
63 | MARTIN Dirk | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - |
64 | SOKOLIK Lucas W. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
65 | ELTERMAN Lev | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% | |
66 | ROBINSON Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
67 | MCNALLY Thomas J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
68 | ERASTUS-OBILO Milan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
69 | COSGROVE Franklin | 100% | 71% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
70 | NASSOS Eric | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
71 | ST. GEORGE David J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - |
72 | LEHNER Brian | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
73 | MCMANIGAL Matthew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 20% | 1% |
74 | STREETER Oliver | 100% | 68% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
75 | SCOTT Alex | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
76 | BROUGHAM Brice | 100% | 75% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
77 | THUMMACHART Sean | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
78 | DAZEY Jason T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
79 | DURHAM Porter | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
80 | TAKATA Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
81 | SLEZAK Christian | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
82 | CLIPPARD Erik J. | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
83 | DESAI Aadi | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
84 | PAPP Mike | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
85 | ALI Adam | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | - | |
86 | CASTELLANOS Rene E. | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
87 | WEINSTEIN Ethan | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
87 | VIDOR Caio | 100% | 68% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
89 | YANG Junhu | 100% | 68% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
90 | TICHENOR Abreham | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.