San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LO Conrad | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
2 | HOSKERI Anik S. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
3 | LYNCH Owen C. | V V V D V D | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
3 | MA Andrew | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
5 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
6 | VALOUEV Aleksey | V V V V V | V V V D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
7 | WOO Christian | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
8 | LLIDO Soren | V D V V V D | V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
9 | KIM Ryan Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
10 | LEVY Jacob | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
11 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | V V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
12 | WANG Ethan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
13 | DERRICK Blake | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
14 | ZHANG Jiening G. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
15 | BAO Aaron | D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
16 | COELHO Cristiano P. | V D D V V V | V V D | 5.8 | 4 | -1.8 |
17 | RASMUSSEN Sage | V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
18 | LI Jett | D V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
19 | FANG Jaden | V D V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
20 | LING Eddie | V V V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
21 | CHOI Ethan | V V D V D V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
22 | CHEN Justin K. | D V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
23 | MAK Osman K. | V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
24 | MA Bryant | D V V D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
25 | WU Lucas | V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
26 | MORROW Brenden | D V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
27 | NG Micah | V D V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
28 | LO Preston | D D D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
29 | WYMAN Julian | V D V D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
30 | TUAN Evan | D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
31 | RUBIN Max | V D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
32 | ZENG Chuyi | D D V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
33 | WU Alber Y. | V D D V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
34 | NGAI Julian | V V D V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
34 | CHU Colin | D V D D V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
36 | TSAY Jordan R. | D V V V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
37 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | D D V V D | D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
38 | AGRAWAL Niki | D V D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
39 | RANJITH Yash M. | V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
40 | ZHANG Luke | V D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
41 | LIU William | D D V D D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
41 | MANIKTALA Suvir | D D V V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
43 | LAM Nicolas | V V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
44 | LOFTUS Luca | D V D D D V | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
45 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
46 | TONKOVICH Ryan | D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
47 | VENKATESH Valen | V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
48 | GORDON William L. | D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
49 | GOLWALA Yash | D D D D V | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
50 | SISINNI Riccardo | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
51 | UHLIG Cole | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
52 | SONG Beckett | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
53 | OSTERHOLT Aiden | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
54 | VARI Julian | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
55 | QUIGLEY Pierce | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
56 | MIN Lucas | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
57 | HUANG Stanley | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
58 | RAHMAN Yousef | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
59 | RAY Oliver | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.