San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% |
| 2 | HOSKERI Anik S. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 3 | LYNCH Owen C. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 3 | MA Andrew | - | - | 6% | 30% | 46% | 18% | |
| 5 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
| 6 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 7 | WOO Christian | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
| 8 | LLIDO Soren | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 9 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 1% |
| 10 | LEVY Jacob | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 11 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
| 12 | WANG Ethan | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
| 13 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
| 14 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% | |
| 15 | BAO Aaron | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 26% | |
| 16 | COELHO Cristiano P. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
| 17 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | 3% | 27% | 44% | 23% | 4% | |
| 18 | LI Jett | - | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 20% | 1% |
| 19 | FANG Jaden | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 20 | LING Eddie | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 37% | 2% |
| 21 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
| 22 | CHEN Justin K. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 23 | MAK Osman K. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | MA Bryant | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | WU Lucas | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 10% | |
| 26 | MORROW Brenden | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | - |
| 27 | NG Micah | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | LO Preston | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 29 | WYMAN Julian | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
| 30 | TUAN Evan | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 31 | RUBIN Max | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | ZENG Chuyi | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | WU Alber Y. | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 34 | NGAI Julian | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | CHU Colin | 4% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
| 36 | TSAY Jordan R. | 11% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
| 38 | AGRAWAL Niki | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | RANJITH Yash M. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | ZHANG Luke | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | LIU William | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | MANIKTALA Suvir | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 43 | LAM Nicolas | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | LOFTUS Luca | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 45 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
| 46 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 47 | VENKATESH Valen | - | 5% | 34% | 42% | 17% | 2% | |
| 48 | GORDON William L. | 13% | 65% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | GOLWALA Yash | 79% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | SISINNI Riccardo | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | UHLIG Cole | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 52 | SONG Beckett | 12% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | OSTERHOLT Aiden | 10% | 39% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | VARI Julian | 8% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | QUIGLEY Pierce | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | MIN Lucas | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | HUANG Stanley | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | RAHMAN Yousef | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | RAY Oliver | 3% | 46% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.