Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Field House) - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LUO Alexander | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | NG Nico | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 3 | GAO Ryan | D V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 3 | CHEN Cameron | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 5 | MANSFIELD Hunter | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 6 | KATS Brandon | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 7 | TUNG Charlie | V D V D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 8 | CARPENTER Touma S. | D V V V D D | V V V V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
| 9 | SZCZAPA Lukas | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 10 | WANG Marcus | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 11 | LIN Qianzhong | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 11 | KABA Elias | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 13 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 14 | CAFASSO Alexander | V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 15 | HENNESSY Levon | V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 16 | ARMSTRONG Payson | V D V V D | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 17 | CHEN Tianjun | V V V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 18 | ZHENG Jason | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 19 | GILLARD Adan | V V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 6 | +3.1 |
| 20 | BRESLAV Asher | V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 20 | TSIEN Richard | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 22 | LAU LUCAS | V V V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 23 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | D V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 24 | THOMAS Andrew | V V V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 25 | LANE Sawyer | D V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 26 | BHANDARE Veer | V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 27 | LOPATIN Sergei | V V D V V | V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 28 | ROBINSON Blake | D V D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 29 | MASKIN Mikhail | V D V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 30 | FRIZZELL Kai | V D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 31 | CHEN Evan | V D D V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 32 | QI Bryan | V V D D D | V V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 33 | SONG Aidan | D V V V V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 34 | TANG Colin | V V V V D V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 35 | NOOL Alexander | V V D V V V | D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 36 | CHO Adrian | D V V V D V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 37 | SHEYDIN Barry | V V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 38 | GUJJA Rishabh | V V D D V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 39 | CHEN Daniel | D V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 40 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 41 | SON Isaac | D V V V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 42 | LI Jayden | D V V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 43 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | V V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 43 | CHEN Jayden A | V V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 45 | ZHU Brady | D V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 46 | KIM Louie | V V D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 47 | CHEN Aiden | D D D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 48 | MERHEJ Sean | D V D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 49 | ROFINO Samuel | D V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 50 | TOMPA Paul | V D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 51 | DAND Zahin | V V D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 52 | ZHENG Jasper | V V V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 53 | CHEN Hayden | D V D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 54 | TANG Jayce | V V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 55 | NOOL Aaron | D D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 56 | KO Ethan | D D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 57 | NOVAK Luke | D D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 58 | ZOU Grant | D V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 59 | YU David | D D V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 60 | JIANG Aidan | D V D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 61 | ZINCHUK Yuri | V D D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 62 | LAI Jaxon | D V D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 63 | CHANG Connor | V D D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 64 | LIU George | D D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 65 | ATKINS Elan | D D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 66 | MILOWSKY Majai | D V V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 67 | JAISING Aaditya | D D D D V V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 68 | CARPENTER Taisei | D D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 69 | ANDERSON Connor | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 70 | LAI Jayden | D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 71 | PINCIROLI Tommaso | D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 72 | YADAV Aarav | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 73 | CHEN Regis | D D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 74 | DUDDA Kavin | D D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 74 | FRANCK Hunter | V D D D D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 76 | KAZARIAN Matthias | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 77 | ZHANG Jacob | D D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 78 | KIM Brendan | D D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 79 | GORE Noah | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 80 | YU MAXIMILIAN | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 81 | DUNCAN John | V D D D D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 82 | KWON Ryan | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 83 | MARKOWITCH Robert | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 84 | SORONDO Aidan | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 85 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 86 | LEE Ryan | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 87 | KESELMAN Ron | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 88 | APFELBAUM Noam | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| 89 | JEONG Joseph | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 90 | O'BRIEN Michael | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 91 | GREGORY Milo | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 92 | MATHEW Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 93 | HERIGSTAD Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.