Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SNYDER IV William B. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | WHEELER Daniel | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | KENYON Benjamin | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | KENYON Jacob | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | EVANS Grant | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 6 | WHITE Myles | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 7 | RIVERA RIVERA Christian | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 8 | BEREKNYEI Thomas | V V V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 9 | COFFEY Jacob | D V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | DISIMONE David Z. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 11 | TIRRELL Justin J. | V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | GAMBINO Robert A. | V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | BUCCELLATO Joel S. | V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 14 | TANG Justin | V V D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | MAGUIRE Timothy | D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 16 | FOREST Sung | D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 17 | CANDELARIA Armando | V V D V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 18 | SHELLY Emery | D D V V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 19 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 20 | MURPHY Megan | V D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 21 | RAWSON Nicholas | D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 22 | DOLBOW Trevor | D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 23 | MOAKLER Christopher | V D V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 24 | KOOB Julian | D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 25 | BOWIE Charlotta | D V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 26 | WOOLF Fredrika | V D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 27 | TAYLOR Robert | D V D D D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 28 | SAMPAIO Beatriz | D D V D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 29 | MOLINA Rommel | D D V D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 30 | TAN Theodore | V D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 31 | PETERSON Christopher | D D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 32 | BERGMANN Beatrix | D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 33 | ECKENROAD Hannah | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 34 | FONS Amandine | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 35 | FONS Jennifer | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 36 | NESTERUK Hope | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 37 | MORTLEY Marissa | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 38 | PAWTAN Carly | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.