Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SNYDER IV William B. | - | - | - | - | 17% | 82% | |
| 2 | WHEELER Daniel | - | - | - | - | 3% | 31% | 66% |
| 3 | KENYON Benjamin | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 3 | KENYON Jacob | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 56% | |
| 5 | EVANS Grant | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
| 6 | WHITE Myles | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 45% | 11% |
| 7 | RIVERA RIVERA Christian | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 8 | BEREKNYEI Thomas | - | - | 10% | 36% | 41% | 12% | |
| 9 | COFFEY Jacob | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 10 | DISIMONE David Z. | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 47% | 22% |
| 11 | TIRRELL Justin J. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% | |
| 12 | GAMBINO Robert A. | - | - | - | 12% | 75% | 13% | |
| 13 | BUCCELLATO Joel S. | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 6% | |
| 14 | TANG Justin | - | 1% | 15% | 46% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | MAGUIRE Timothy | - | 5% | 37% | 56% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | FOREST Sung | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 17 | CANDELARIA Armando | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 18 | SHELLY Emery | - | - | 8% | 35% | 42% | 14% | 1% |
| 19 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | - | 3% | 57% | 35% | 4% | - | |
| 20 | MURPHY Megan | - | 3% | 25% | 48% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 21 | RAWSON Nicholas | - | 1% | 15% | 50% | 30% | 4% | |
| 22 | DOLBOW Trevor | 2% | 17% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 23 | MOAKLER Christopher | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 24 | KOOB Julian | 2% | 36% | 55% | 6% | - | - | |
| 25 | BOWIE Charlotta | 1% | 24% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | WOOLF Fredrika | - | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 27 | TAYLOR Robert | 53% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 28 | SAMPAIO Beatriz | 21% | 68% | 11% | - | - | - | |
| 29 | MOLINA Rommel | 20% | 65% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 30 | TAN Theodore | 44% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | PETERSON Christopher | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | BERGMANN Beatrix | 10% | 45% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | ECKENROAD Hannah | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 34 | FONS Amandine | 22% | 60% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | FONS Jennifer | 68% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | NESTERUK Hope | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 37 | MORTLEY Marissa | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | PAWTAN Carly | 64% | 33% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.