Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SNYDER IV William B. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | WHEELER Daniel | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | KENYON Benjamin | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | KENYON Jacob | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | EVANS Grant | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 6 | WHITE Myles | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 7 | RIVERA RIVERA Christian | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 8 | BEREKNYEI Thomas | V V V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 9 | COFFEY Jacob | D V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | DISIMONE David Z. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 11 | TIRRELL Justin J. | V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | GAMBINO Robert A. | V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | BUCCELLATO Joel S. | V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 14 | TANG Justin | V V D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | MAGUIRE Timothy | D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 16 | FOREST Sung | D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 17 | CANDELARIA Armando | V V D V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 18 | SHELLY Emery | D D V V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 19 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 20 | MURPHY Megan | V D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 21 | RAWSON Nicholas | D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 22 | DOLBOW Trevor | D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 23 | MOAKLER Christopher | V D V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 24 | KOOB Julian | D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 25 | BOWIE Charlotta | D V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 26 | WOOLF Fredrika | V D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 27 | TAYLOR Robert | D V D D D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 28 | SAMPAIO Beatriz | D D V D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 29 | MOLINA Rommel | D D V D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 30 | TAN Theodore | V D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 31 | PETERSON Christopher | D D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 32 | BERGMANN Beatrix | D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 33 | ECKENROAD Hannah | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 34 | FONS Amandine | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 35 | FONS Jennifer | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 36 | NESTERUK Hope | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 37 | MORTLEY Marissa | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 38 | PAWTAN Carly | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.