Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC

Y-12 Men's Foil

Friday, November 28, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIM Eunseong 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 80%
2 XU Terrance 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 10%
3 WANG Mendy 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 61%
3 SONG Enoch 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 34%
5 HUYNH Matthew 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 63%
6 CHANG Parker 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 35%
7 ZHAI Derrick 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 70%
8 PARK Gi Beom 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 36%
9 LIU Alex 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 50%
10 XIAN kevin 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 81%
10 WU Wallace 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 75%
12 DESERANNO Leander 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 83%
13 WANG Caleb 100% 100% 100% 92% 51%
14 JIN George 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 19%
15 ZHUANG Disheng (Eddie) 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 26%
16 GUGALA Frank 100% 100% 96% 77% 36% 5%
17 LYU Brandon 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 44%
18 LIN Lucas 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 17%
19 PAN Howard Haoran 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 47% 13%
20 HU Michael 100% 100% 99% 94% 69% 26%
21 CAO Joshua 100% 100% 99% 92% 57%
22 FAN Ze Lin 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 49%
23 NGUYEN Norris 100% 99% 94% 75% 41% 11% -
24 RYU Dae Hyeon 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 27% 5%
25 SU Sean 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 22% 3%
26 PARK Joshua 100% 100% 100% 97% 75% 31% 2%
27 ZHANG Eric 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 34% 6%
28 EVANS Desmond 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 64%
29 QIAN Will 100% 100% 99% 88% 57% 16%
30 GOLI Arush Missing ID
31 QU Richard 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 28%
32 CHEN Ethan 100% 100% 96% 74% 30% 3%
33 ZHAI Alex 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 58% 10%
34 DENG Jonathan 100% 100% 97% 79% 39% 8% 1%
35 ZHAO David 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 35% 8%
36 ZHENG Lerui 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 17%
37 HUDSON Jedidiah 100% 97% 80% 46% 15% 2% -
38 LIU Bradley 100% 99% 93% 68% 27% 2%
39 ZHANG Aaron 100% 100% 99% 88% 50% 9%
40 TIAN Andy 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 26% 3%
41 KIAYIAS Anthony 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 39% 5%
41 VENAFRO Tristan 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 60% 12%
43 WANG Jaaziel 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 18% 1%
44 ZHONG Kingsley 100% 100% 97% 80% 45% 13% 1%
45 WILSON Jacob 100% 100% 98% 85% 56% 22% 4%
46 CHEN Keegan 100% 100% 97% 80% 40% 8% -
47 HUANG Dalynn 100% 100% 99% 93% 66% 21%
48 CORCOS Joseph-Georges 100% 99% 87% 55% 19% 3%
49 LI Andrew 100% 99% 92% 65% 26% 4%
50 CAO Aaron 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 38% 6%
51 LIN Tyler 100% 96% 71% 28% 5% - -
52 TARDIFF Owen 100% 98% 85% 50% 14% 1%
53 XIA Vincent 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 23% 3%
54 CHONG Cooper 100% 100% 93% 62% 22% 3% -
55 CREMEL Remi 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 33% 3%
56 YU Adam 100% 96% 72% 29% 4%
57 XU ETHAN 100% 100% 98% 85% 47% 11% 1%
58 LIN George 100% 100% 93% 69% 34% 10% 1%
59 YANG Luca 100% 100% 95% 71% 34% 8% 1%
60 MACKENZIE Dylan 100% 94% 69% 33% 9% 1% -
61 JIANG Ethan 100% 95% 62% 15% 1%
62 CASCONE Raffaele 100% 100% 94% 71% 33% 8% 1%
63 LI Eric 100% 94% 68% 31% 7% 1% -
64 HUANG Lucas 100% 100% 100% 95% 68% 24% 2%
65 HAN Jiaren 100% 100% 96% 75% 32% 4%
66 WU Max 100% 99% 88% 55% 17% 2%
67 PINTOLE Anthony 100% 97% 80% 39% 6%
68 MOON Nolan 100% 100% 99% 92% 58% 17% 1%
69 MENG Andy 100% 96% 65% 21% 3% -
70 LU Ethan 100% 96% 74% 35% 8% -
71 ZHANG William 100% 100% 96% 78% 45% 15% 2%
72 HUA Isaac 100% 99% 94% 74% 37% 8% -
73 LIU KUNDE 100% 89% 57% 23% 5% - -
74 YIN Luke 100% 96% 77% 42% 12% 2% -
74 SHEN Lucas 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 10% 1%
76 FOO Kingston 100% 100% 97% 83% 52% 17% 1%
77 LIU Mason 100% 99% 87% 57% 24% 5% -
78 XIA Wenhao 100% 99% 90% 63% 26% 5% -
79 DING Jacob 100% 96% 63% 20% 2% -
80 SAVIR Ethan 100% 96% 67% 27% 5% - -
81 YU Ethan 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 18% 2%
81 LIU Max 100% 87% 51% 16% 3% - -
83 BUCHNER Roland 100% 98% 87% 55% 21% 4% -
84 HUYNH Kaleb 100% 100% 97% 77% 24%
85 YOON Mason 100% 99% 87% 53% 17% 2%
86 ZUO Yizhi 100% 78% 36% 8% 1% -
87 GOLDSTEIN Tate 100% 90% 45% 8% -
87 LIN Alexander 100% 78% 34% 7% 1% -
89 WU Yulen 100% 97% 81% 44% 12% 1%
90 LIU Brady 100% 92% 59% 20% 3% -
91 PU Yikun 100% 100% 93% 66% 28% 5% -
92 AMR HOSSNY Adam 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4%
93 HUANG Owen 100% 100% 96% 80% 48% 17% 2%
94 GUTKOVSKIY Ryan 100% 95% 73% 38% 11% 1% -
95 MOORE Quinn 100% 99% 89% 60% 26% 6% 1%
96 BROD Baylin 100% 81% 41% 12% 2% - -
97 POLEBOYINA Aarav 100% 71% 24% 3% - - -
98 XU Jonathan 100% 94% 66% 27% 5% -
99 NAYAK Saideep 100% 57% 13% 1% - - -
100 HE Ryan 100% 99% 89% 53% 16% 2% -
101 STABROWSKI Joaquin 100% 94% 70% 35% 10% 1% -
102 KUTATELADZE Danieli 100% 96% 76% 41% 12% 2% -
103 LIU KELVIN 100% 69% 19% 2% - - -
104 LI Ethan 100% 61% 19% 3% - -
105 NATURMAN Noah 100% 98% 81% 42% 12% 2% -
105 FAN Oscar 100% 93% 60% 16% 2% - -
107 KIM Marcus 100% 73% 29% 5% -
108 HAN Jayden 100% 95% 71% 29% 5% -
109 DUAN EDWIN 100% 97% 75% 35% 8% 1%
110 CHANG Joshua 100% 71% 26% 4% - -
111 XU Jaden 100% 74% 29% 5% - -
112 CHAN Cosmos HH 100% 100% 96% 82% 52% 20% 3%
113 WU Connor 100% 88% 55% 21% 4% - -
114 AN Jacob 100% 88% 54% 19% 3% - -
115 JAZWINSKI Archer 100% 76% 31% 7% 1% - -
116 MENZEL Lucas 100% 100% 95% 70% 29% 5% -
117 MOSAMEH Faraj 100% 87% 51% 17% 3% - -
118 CREMEL Louis 100% 61% 15% 2% - - -
119 FANG Ryan 100% 86% 48% 15% 3% - -
120 CHUNG Royce 100% 98% 66% 26% 5% 1% -
121 KANAN Noland 100% 100% 98% 80% 41% 9% 1%
122 LEE Ryan 100% 70% 24% 4% - -
123 CAI Charlie 100% 80% 35% 7% -
124 LIN Alex 100% 49% 11% 1% - -
125 TANG QIXING Missing ID
126 GENG Vincent 100% 97% 83% 50% 18% 3% -
127 HO Marcus 100% 97% 81% 48% 16% 2% -
128 ENOIU Ethan 100% 15% 1% - - - -
129 SUN Neil 100% 73% 22% 3% - - -
130 KIM Rowan 100% 28% 3% - - -
131 AWALGAONKAR Aahan 100% 67% 21% 3% - - -
132 LEONG Michael 100% 77% 34% 7% 1% -
133 AN Graham 100% 69% 26% 5% 1% - -
134 MATIYASH Andrew 100% 79% 34% 6% 1% - -
135 CHAN Theo 100% 38% 5% - -
136 RICE Henry 100% 70% 23% 2% - - -
137 ZHANG Andrew 100% 70% 25% 5% - - -
138 MA Leo Missing ID
138 HWANG Samuel 100% 34% 5% - - - -
140 CHEN Aidan 100% 33% 5% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.