Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Saturday, November 29, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SIMONOV Timofey - - - - - 9% 90%
2 ZHENG Marcus - - - - 3% 26% 71%
3 ZHAI Derrick - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
3 HUA Aaron - - - 1% 9% 40% 51%
5 DOELL Ethan - - - - - 10% 89%
5 KO Caleb - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
7 SHIN Noah - - - 2% 15% 48% 35%
8 JIN Andy - - 5% 24% 44% 27%
9 WANG Mendy - - - 3% 19% 45% 32%
10 YANG David H. - - 3% 13% 31% 36% 17%
11 KUO Phineas - - 3% 14% 32% 35% 14%
12 PAN Ethan - - - 6% 34% 59%
13 KIM Daniel - 1% 5% 16% 33% 33% 13%
14 BAI Austin - - - 4% 22% 46% 27%
15 ZHANG Hanru - - 1% 11% 33% 39% 16%
16 TANG Royce - - 3% 18% 40% 34% 5%
17 CHENG Logan - - - - 1% 19% 80%
18 FANG Haoyu - - - - 6% 34% 59%
19 CHEN Anson - - - 3% 20% 45% 32%
20 CHANG Parker - 1% 7% 29% 43% 20%
21 LIM Eunseong - - - 4% 20% 46% 31%
22 XU Nathan - - - 2% 13% 46% 39%
22 NABASSOUA Djibril - 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 7%
24 ZHAO Ryan - - 1% 6% 28% 48% 18%
24 SAMUEL Lucas - - 1% 10% 43% 41% 4%
26 JAZWINSKI Ryan - - 2% 12% 36% 38% 12%
27 PLUMMER Waylon - - 2% 12% 34% 38% 14%
28 LIN Jun Hui - 2% 10% 26% 34% 22% 6%
29 HOU Gaven - - - 2% 16% 48% 34%
30 HUYNH Matthew - - 5% 26% 48% 20%
31 KAYE Ben - 2% 13% 34% 35% 14% 2%
32 DESERANNO Leander - - 1% 13% 43% 42%
33 LIU Alex - - - 2% 18% 50% 30%
34 PARK Gi Beom - - 1% 11% 33% 39% 15%
35 QU Richard - 1% 10% 34% 42% 13%
36 FAN Ze Lin - - 1% 6% 26% 45% 22%
37 NOVIKOV Yann - 2% 12% 28% 34% 20% 4%
38 KINGSLEY Griffin - - 4% 17% 37% 34% 8%
39 ZHAI Alex - 1% 13% 40% 38% 7%
40 SHAW Eric - 9% 37% 39% 13% 1%
41 XIAN kevin - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
42 ZHENG Austin 1% 9% 36% 40% 14% 1%
43 WANG Caleb - - 1% 13% 47% 35% 3%
44 LI Jayden - - 5% 24% 43% 26% 1%
45 PAN Howard Haoran - 2% 10% 25% 34% 23% 6%
46 SONG HAN GYEOL 1% 10% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1%
47 SONG Enoch - 1% 10% 31% 39% 18% 2%
47 KUPERBERG Thomas 1% 7% 23% 34% 25% 9% 1%
49 JIN Daniel - - 2% 11% 34% 42% 11%
50 LIN John - 5% 20% 37% 29% 8% 1%
50 WANG Freyr - 4% 21% 39% 29% 7% -
52 VENAFRO Tristan 1% 6% 21% 35% 27% 10% 1%
53 CHEN Ethan 5% 21% 33% 27% 12% 3% -
54 KEEGAN Cole - 4% 21% 40% 28% 6% -
55 ZHUANG Disheng (Eddie) - 3% 19% 43% 30% 5%
56 OH Joshua - 1% 5% 18% 33% 31% 11%
57 QIAN Will - 1% 8% 30% 41% 19% 1%
58 TOOMRE Kai - 1% 7% 21% 35% 28% 8%
59 RYU Dae Hyeon 5% 21% 33% 27% 12% 2% -
60 JIN George - 1% 6% 27% 43% 22% 1%
61 RAY Callum 5% 21% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
62 GRIGORIEV Michael - 6% 24% 41% 25% 5%
63 AYYAGARI Abhiram 4% 24% 41% 25% 6% -
64 ZHANG Ethan 3% 23% 45% 24% 5% -
65 KUBBA Krish - 2% 16% 38% 34% 9% 1%
66 HU Michael - 4% 19% 37% 30% 9% 1%
67 XIA Vincent 2% 11% 28% 33% 20% 6% 1%
68 XU Ryan - 4% 19% 38% 31% 8% 1%
69 WANG Luke 1% 5% 19% 32% 29% 12% 2%
70 LIN George 1% 13% 38% 34% 12% 2% -
71 ZHANG Aaron 2% 10% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
72 BAS Jonathan 1% 16% 39% 33% 10% 1%
73 HUA Isaac 3% 17% 36% 31% 11% 1% -
74 CHOI Hunter - 4% 22% 40% 26% 7% 1%
75 LEONG Samuel 1% 8% 25% 35% 24% 7% 1%
76 MA Matthew 3% 15% 31% 31% 16% 4% -
77 ARORA Maximilian Andras A. 1% 9% 29% 40% 18% 3% -
78 WANG Joshua 10% 34% 38% 16% 2% - -
79 HUYNH Kaleb - 3% 17% 38% 32% 9% -
80 GUGALA Frank 1% 9% 28% 36% 21% 5% -
80 SUSANTO William - - 2% 13% 37% 37% 12%
82 BUCHNER Roland 18% 38% 30% 11% 2% - -
83 LU Hansen - 4% 19% 35% 30% 10% 1%
84 PU Yikun 1% 12% 33% 36% 16% 2% -
84 TIMCHENKO Fiodor 1% 13% 37% 38% 10% 1% -
86 QIAN Zekai - 1% 8% 29% 41% 20% 1%
87 DENG Jonathan 5% 22% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
88 FOO Kingston 8% 39% 38% 13% 2% -
89 EVANS Desmond - - 3% 15% 34% 36% 13%
90 SUN Nathan 1% 11% 32% 36% 17% 3% -
91 HUANG Nathan - 2% 11% 27% 34% 20% 5%
92 ZHONG Kingsley 1% 8% 30% 38% 20% 4% -
93 CHAE Thomas Woojin 11% 46% 33% 9% 1% - -
94 LI Andrew 1% 6% 24% 38% 25% 6% -
95 KIAYIAS Anthony 1% 16% 37% 33% 12% 2% -
96 SHARMA Ari 3% 20% 39% 29% 8% 1% -
96 DAVE Neil 8% 32% 39% 18% 3% - -
98 LI Eric 26% 47% 22% 4% - - -
99 HU Weijie 1% 12% 36% 35% 14% 2% -
100 TIAN Andy - 4% 18% 38% 31% 9% 1%
100 LIN Oliver 6% 27% 42% 22% 3% - -
102 PANG Owen 43% 42% 14% 2% - - -
103 SHEN Lucas 2% 14% 37% 33% 12% 1% -
104 AMR HOSSNY Adam 1% 9% 30% 38% 19% 3% -
104 KUTATELADZE Danieli 16% 49% 28% 6% - - -
106 WU Max 5% 27% 40% 22% 5% - -
107 HUANG Jinyao 1% 17% 38% 32% 11% 1% -
108 AN Jacob 62% 32% 6% - - - -
108 LEE Aeden 4% 23% 37% 26% 9% 1% -
110 REN Ryan - 4% 22% 40% 27% 6% -
111 IM Andrew 18% 41% 30% 10% 1% - -
112 GOLI Arush 12% 51% 31% 6% - -
113 ZHENG Lerui - 7% 30% 41% 19% 3%
114 BRADFORD-WATT Ezra 10% 43% 36% 10% 1% -
114 LEE Kyle 14% 41% 34% 11% 1% -
116 CHONG Cooper 38% 43% 16% 3% - -
117 ZHAO David 1% 13% 39% 34% 11% 2% -
118 YANG Luca 7% 24% 34% 25% 9% 2% -
119 LIU jeremy 1% 11% 32% 37% 17% 2% -
119 LEE Ryan 25% 44% 25% 6% 1% - -
121 CHEN Kevin 8% 34% 39% 16% 3% - -
122 WATERFIELD Lysander 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
123 DING Jacob 13% 37% 35% 13% 2% - -
124 HUDSON Jedidiah 38% 41% 17% 3% - - -
125 HAN Jiaren 6% 27% 37% 22% 7% 1% -
126 MOORE Quinn 7% 37% 38% 15% 2% - -
127 BEYDOUN Sam 2% 10% 25% 33% 22% 8% 1%
128 YANG CHENLE < 1% 2% 9% 25% 35% 23% 6%
129 CHUNG Royce 24% 40% 26% 8% 1% - -
130 WANG Jaaziel 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2% -
131 FANG Ryan 44% 40% 14% 2% - - -
132 RAJAT Rivaan 7% 32% 40% 17% 3% - -
133 GOLDSTEIN Tate 23% 43% 26% 7% 1% - -
134 LEONG Michael 29% 44% 23% 5% - - -
135 DAVIDSON Henry 27% 40% 24% 7% 1% - -
136 MATIYASH Andrew 22% 45% 27% 6% - - -
137 XU Jonathan 16% 40% 33% 10% 1% - -
138 KOO Jaeha 62% 33% 5% - - -
139 LIU Brady 22% 43% 27% 7% 1% - -
140 SUN Andrew 64% 31% 5% - - -
141 NAYAK Saideep 61% 33% 5% - - - -
141 LIU Mason 18% 39% 30% 11% 2% - -
143 CREMEL Remi 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
143 YEUNG rex 32% 46% 19% 3% - - -
145 XU Jaden 26% 43% 24% 6% 1% - -
146 TAN Winston 66% 30% 4% - - -
147 LIU Kunshuo 55% 36% 9% 1% - - -
148 LIN Alex 27% 46% 23% 4% - - -
149 VAN DER HARTEN Lukas 76% 21% 2% - - - -
150 CHANG Joshua 56% 37% 6% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.