Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 2 | YIP Allison | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 52% | 24% |
| 3 | LI Anna | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% | |
| 3 | VINLUAN Emma | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 5 | LIAO irene | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 41% | 50% |
| 6 | FU Shannon | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
| 7 | ZHAO Ellie | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
| 8 | KOU Cynthia | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 9 | LI Allison | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% |
| 10 | YU Chloe | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% | |
| 11 | DEJOY Leilah | 2% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 10% | ||
| 12 | WANG Kercedes Ye | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 13 | KUSHNERENKO Maiia | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 14 | HUANG Jui-An | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | - |
| 15 | LU Chu | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | MIAO Anthea | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 17 | DU Chelsea | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 18 | YANG Nina | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 44% | 14% |
| 19 | SUN Joanna | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | ||
| 20 | ARNOLD Evangeline | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 20% | |
| 21 | DU Chloe | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
| 22 | MUHLENBRUCH Cora | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 23 | WONG Isabelle | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% | |
| 24 | FLYNN Kensington | 1% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 25 | LICON Katherine | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 26 | RONG Hilary | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | HUANG Sophie | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | VOO Evelyn | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
| 29 | CHONG Emma | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | ||
| 30 | STEPHAN Antje Elisa | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LIU Emma | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 31 | LI zoey | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 33 | LYNTON Alexandra | - | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 34 | TRUONG Chloe | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | WANG Phoebe | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 36 | CHU Brianna | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 37 | LYNTON Olivia | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 38 | LEE Layla | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | SU Hermione Su | 28% | 41% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | WANG Olivia | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
| 42 | SCHMIDT Alexis | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | BAI lufei | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 44 | SHIH Eva | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 45 | DEFENSOR Ella | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | MA Sloane | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | ||
| 47 | PARKE Jaime | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 48 | ZHANG ANGELA | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | ||
| 49 | YU Elise | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 50 | PUTTAMRAJU Nithya | 5% | 37% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | SHIH Cayla | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | DING Xuanwen | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 15% | - |
| 53 | WANG Elizabeth | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SUN Annika | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | MANDAP Natalya | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | ZHOU Emily | < 1% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 57 | ROBERTSON Sienna | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | KANE Sloan | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.