Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 2 | YIP Allison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 24% |
| 3 | LI Anna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | |
| 3 | VINLUAN Emma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% | 1% |
| 5 | LIAO irene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% |
| 6 | FU Shannon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 7 | ZHAO Ellie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 8 | KOU Cynthia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 9 | LI Allison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
| 10 | YU Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% | |
| 11 | DEJOY Leilah | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% | ||
| 12 | WANG Kercedes Ye | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 13 | KUSHNERENKO Maiia | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 14 | HUANG Jui-An | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | - |
| 15 | LU Chu | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | MIAO Anthea | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 17 | DU Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 18 | YANG Nina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 14% |
| 19 | SUN Joanna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | ||
| 20 | ARNOLD Evangeline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 21 | DU Chloe | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 22 | MUHLENBRUCH Cora | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 23 | WONG Isabelle | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% | |
| 24 | FLYNN Kensington | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 25 | LICON Katherine | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 6% | |
| 26 | RONG Hilary | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | HUANG Sophie | 100% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | VOO Evelyn | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 29 | CHONG Emma | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 5% | ||
| 30 | STEPHAN Antje Elisa | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 31 | LIU Emma | 100% | 98% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 31 | LI zoey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 33 | LYNTON Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 34 | TRUONG Chloe | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 35 | WANG Phoebe | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 36 | CHU Brianna | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 37 | LYNTON Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 38 | LEE Layla | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | SU Hermione Su | 100% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | WANG Olivia | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 42 | SCHMIDT Alexis | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 43 | BAI lufei | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 44 | SHIH Eva | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 45 | DEFENSOR Ella | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | MA Sloane | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | ||
| 47 | PARKE Jaime | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 48 | ZHANG ANGELA | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | ||
| 49 | YU Elise | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 50 | PUTTAMRAJU Nithya | 100% | 95% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | SHIH Cayla | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | DING Xuanwen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 15% | - |
| 53 | WANG Elizabeth | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SUN Annika | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | MANDAP Natalya | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 56 | ZHOU Emily | 100% | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 57 | ROBERTSON Sienna | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | KANE Sloan | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.