Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TAO Jiemi | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 2 | SUN Lucas | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | MAZAHERI John | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 3 | ZHANG William | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 5 | HUANG Owen | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | LI Mason | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 7 | ZHANG Benjamin | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 8 | TIKHONOV Aleksandr | V V D V D D | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | ZENG Cayden | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 10 | LOZANO Koen Alexander | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 11 | CHEN Dante | V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | YU Ethan | V D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | HO Kasper | V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | CHANG Owen | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | XU Daniel | D V V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 16 | HUANG Aaron Jingyuan | D D V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 17 | LI Yunze | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | ZHANG alex | V D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 20 | ROSOWSKY Phoenix | V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 21 | MENG Andy | V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 22 | BAGWELL Theodore | V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 23 | LIN Evan | V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 24 | MENG Eric | D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 25 | LEE Elliot | V V D D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 26 | CREMEL Louis | V D V | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 27 | LIU Jordan | D D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 28 | ZHANG Bryant | V V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 29 | XU Benjamin | V D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 30 | YIN Luke | D V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 31 | DONG YIKUN | D V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 32 | WANG Theodore | V D D D V D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 33 | DOMANTAY Dylan | V V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 34 | CHANG Hayden | D V V D D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 35 | WU William | D V V V D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 36 | SANGANI Niam | V D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 37 | CHUNG Lucas | D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 38 | HE Andrew | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 39 | VIVAS Greyson | V D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 40 | FAZIO Lorenzo | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 42 | BROD Baylin | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 43 | SASOMSUP Kaison | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 44 | YUAN Vincent | D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 45 | GONG Luke | D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 46 | TU William | D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 47 | NACU Andre | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 48 | WU Kangdi | D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 49 | FUNG Andrew | D D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 50 | LU Nathan | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 51 | HUANG Jeremy Jingcai | D D D D D V | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
| 52 | SIN Chad | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 53 | MALPICA Tao | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 54 | CHEN Alwyn | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 55 | SHAO Vincent li | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 55 | DING Jason | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 57 | OH Aaron | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.