Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAO Jiemi | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 2 | SUN Lucas | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% |
| 3 | MAZAHERI John | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 49% |
| 3 | ZHANG William | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% | |
| 5 | HUANG Owen | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% | |
| 6 | LI Mason | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 7 | ZHANG Benjamin | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 8 | TIKHONOV Aleksandr | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | ZENG Cayden | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 10 | LOZANO Koen Alexander | - | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 4% |
| 11 | CHEN Dante | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
| 12 | YU Ethan | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% | |
| 13 | HO Kasper | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% | |
| 14 | CHANG Owen | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 15 | XU Daniel | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 11% |
| 16 | HUANG Aaron Jingyuan | 1% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | LI Yunze | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
| 18 | ZHANG alex | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
| 20 | ROSOWSKY Phoenix | - | 6% | 33% | 61% | |||
| 21 | MENG Andy | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 22 | BAGWELL Theodore | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | |
| 23 | LIN Evan | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 24 | MENG Eric | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 25 | LEE Elliot | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 26 | CREMEL Louis | 35% | 46% | 17% | 1% | |||
| 27 | LIU Jordan | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | ZHANG Bryant | 12% | 41% | 39% | 7% | |||
| 29 | XU Benjamin | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | YIN Luke | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
| 31 | DONG YIKUN | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 32 | WANG Theodore | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 33 | DOMANTAY Dylan | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | CHANG Hayden | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | WU William | 5% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SANGANI Niam | 1% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% | |
| 37 | CHUNG Lucas | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 38 | HE Andrew | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | VIVAS Greyson | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | FAZIO Lorenzo | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 42 | BROD Baylin | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | SASOMSUP Kaison | 8% | 36% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | YUAN Vincent | 2% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 45 | GONG Luke | 19% | 47% | 30% | 4% | |||
| 46 | TU William | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 47 | NACU Andre | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 48 | WU Kangdi | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | FUNG Andrew | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | LU Nathan | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | HUANG Jeremy Jingcai | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | SIN Chad | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 53 | MALPICA Tao | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CHEN Alwyn | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 55 | SHAO Vincent li | 79% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | DING Jason | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | OH Aaron | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.