2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victories | 6 | 3 | - | - | - | 9 |
Losses | 12 | 4 | - | - | - | 16 |
Win Ratio | 33.3% | 42.9% | - | - | - | 36.0% |
Pool Victories | 6 | 2 | - | - | - | 8 |
Pool Losses | 9 | 3 | - | - | - | 12 |
Pool Win Ratio | 40.0% | 40.0% | - | - | - | 40.0% |
DE Victories | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
DE Losses | 3 | 1 | - | - | - | 4 |
DE Win Ratio | 0.0% | 50.0% | - | - | - | 20.0% |
Note: Seasons start on August 1st and end on July 31st.
2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Easy wins† | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
Easy wins as % of wins | 16.7% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 11.1% |
Close wins‡ | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | 4 |
Close wins as % of all wins | 33.3% | 66.7% | - | - | - | 44.4% |
Close losses‡ | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
Close losses as % of all losses | 8.3% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 6.2% |
Big losses† | 7 | 4 | - | - | - | 11 |
Big losses as % of all losses | 58.3% | 100.0% | - | - | - | 68.8% |
† Easy victories or big losses are those with the score difference of 4 or more touches in a pool, 7 or
more touches in direct elimination, and 5 or more in veteran and youth direct elimination.
‡ Close bouts are those with the score difference of 1 or fewer touches in a pool, 3 or
fewer touches in direct elimination, or 2 or fewer touches in veteran or youth direct elimination.
2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victories | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
Victories as % of all victories | 16.7% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 11.1% |
Losses | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Losses as % of all losses | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 0.0% |
Total | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
Total as % of all bouts | 5.6% | 0.0% | - | - | - | 4.0% |
2025-2026 | 2024-2025 | 2023-2024 | 2022-2023 | Before 2022 | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Events | 3 | 1 | - | - | - | 4 |
Tournaments | 2 | 1 | - | - | - | 3 |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | D | 2:5 | CHANG George | 29 | U | 17 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 379 | 782 | 104.1 | 73% | ||
Pool | V | 5:3 | STOCK Ian | 20 | U | 43 | Piedmont Fencing Team | 106 | 678 | 25.5 | 81% | ||
Pool | D | 0:5 | XU Daniel | 4 | 36 | U | 9 | Socal Fencing Center | 980 | 704 | 40.5 | 33% | |
Pool | D | 1:5 | GAO Ethan | 49 | U | 37 | Socal Fencing Center | 259 | 663 | 86.3 | 74% | ||
Pool | D | 1:5 | RUDENKO Zhdan | 52 | U | 20 | Elite Fencing Club | 308 | 577 | 69.2 | 66% | ||
Pool | D | 4:5 | HE Andrew | 36 | U | 39 | Silicon Valley Fencing Center | 659 | 508 | 36.9 | 41% | ||
T64 | D | 6:10 | RUDENKO Zhdan | 52 | U | 20 | Elite Fencing Club | 793 | 1437 | 344.0 | 78% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | D | 0:5 | CHUNG Katie | 6 | U | 2 | Socal Fencing Center | ||||||
Pool | D | 0:5 | BHANGOO Arman | 8 | U | 3 | Golubitsky Fencing Center | 531 | 935 | 137.8 | 73% | ||
Pool | D | 1:5 | TROYANKER Makar | 1 | U | 1 | LA International Fencing Center | 991 | 797 | 61.3 | 38% | ||
Pool | V | 5:4 | LEE Joseph | 5 | U | 8 | LAIFC / Orange County Fencing Center | 440 | 736 | 46.8 | 67% | ||
T8 | D | 3:15 | CHUNG Katie | 6 | U | 2 | Socal Fencing Center |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | D | 2:5 | SHEN Cyrus | 1 | U | 3 | LA International Fencing Center | 120 | 1001 | 318.9 | 89% | ||
Pool | V | 5:4 | SASOMSUP Kaison | 10 | U | 3 | United Fencing Academy | 634 | 682 | 91.5 | 52% | ||
Pool | V | 4:2 | DOMANTAY Dylan | 9 | U | 7 | 144 | 773 | 44.1 | 82% | |||
Pool | V | 5:1 | DING Jason | 4 | U | 11 | SoCAL Fencing Center | 179 | 817 | 40.3 | 80% | ||
Pool | V | 5:2 | SMITH Benson | 6 | U | 9 | Socal Fencing Center | 682 | 858 | 77.1 | 60% | ||
T8 | D | 6:10 | NGUYEN Rhys | 3 | U | 2 | Precision Athletics Fencing Club | 1767 | 1627 | 189.9 | 44% |
Bout | Score | Opponent | Seed | Rank | Rating | Place | Club | Opponent Strength |
Strength | Change | Chance of Victory |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | D | 0:5 | MENG Andy | 2 | U | 1 | Golubitsky Fencing Center | 839 | 2500 | 1385.6 | 95% | ||
Pool | D | 1:5 | OH Aaron | 5 | U | 2 | Elite International Fencers Club | 2500 | 1114 | 56.9 | 12% | ||
Pool | V | 5:4 | LIBIGER Krystof | 1 | U | 6 | Team Touche Fencing Center | 545 | 1058 | 148.5 | 72% | ||
Pool | V | 5:4 | MORAGA Jack | 6 | U | 5 | Team Touche Fencing Center | 1158 | 1206 | 209.1 | 52% | ||
Pool | D | 1:5 | FAZIO Lorenzo | 3 | U | 3 | Team Touche Fencing Center / La International Fencing | 530 | 1415 | 414.5 | 88% | ||
T8 | V | 10:6 | LIBIGER Krystof | 1 | U | 6 | Team Touche Fencing Center | 2079 | 2500 | 331.8 | 63% | ||
T4 | D | 0:10 | MENG Andy | 2 | U | 1 | Golubitsky Fencing Center | 1180 | 2832 | 1204.4 | 96% |