San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DUONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 2 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 3 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 3 | POPOVICI Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% |
| 5 | AU Marcus J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
| 6 | LIU Felix | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% | |
| 7 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 8 | COLLINS Damase | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
| 9 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 10 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 11 | SIVAGAR Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 12 | LIU Kirk D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 13 | KATZ Matheo | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 14 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 15 | WRIGHT Christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 16 | STENNIS Brendan | 100% | 74% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 17 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
| 19 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 20 | KENNY Oliver R. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 22 | MILEY Nick N. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | WEAVER Neil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
| 24 | BAGCHI Aritra | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 100% | 99% | 82% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 26 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 27 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | KUO Elvin | 100% | 97% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LAU Matthew | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 30 | BRINEN-STOUT Jared P. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | MING Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 32 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 100% | 90% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | HASAN Raamis | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 36 | FINE Gabriel C. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | YALAMANCHALI Pranay | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | MALEEV Georgy | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | QUIROGA Kyle | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | AYER Ishaan | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.