San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | NAGIMOV Marsel | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
2 | BANERJEE Anup | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
3 | ZENG Lucas H. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
3 | ZHANG Luke T. | V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
5 | LIN Dashiell | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
5 | JEON Caleb A. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
8 | SOMERS Sean | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
9 | TSANG Matthew K. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
10 | DANKAR Neel | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
11 | LO Conrad | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
12 | NG Eben S. | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
13 | WONG Nicholas A. | V V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
14 | LIM Charles Q. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
15 | TSAY Jeremy M. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
16 | DETERING Julian | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
17 | HOBSON Aaron K. | V V D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
18 | HOU Kenneth | V V V V D | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
19 | LAI Christopher W. | V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
20 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
21 | MILLER Duncan R. | V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
22 | CHEN Bryce | V D V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
23 | HUANG Bernard | V V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
24 | KHER Roan | D D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
25 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | D V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
26 | MU Jeffrey | D V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
27 | HE Bu Wei O. | V D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
28 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
29 | UPENDER Sky | V D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
30 | UZGIRIS Kovas | V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
31 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
32 | CHOPRA Rohan A. | D V D V D | V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
33 | HARRIS Otto | V V D V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
34 | CHUANG Kian J. | V V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
35 | BAO Aaron | D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
36 | WILT Daniel E. | V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
37 | TANG Adrian | D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
38 | BARTELS Milo | D V V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
38 | YEE Johnathan | V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
40 | FINNEY Lorenz | D D V V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
41 | BELANGER Jackson | D V V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
42 | WOO Christian | D V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
43 | CRACRAFT John R. | D V V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
44 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | D V V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
45 | HOSKERI Anik S. | D D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
46 | ZENG Chuyi | D D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
47 | KIM Ryan Y. | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
48 | WONG Louis | D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
50 | LIN Richard | D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
51 | ZHANG Jiening G. | D V D D D D | D | 4.2 | 1 | -3.2 |
52 | TEH Ryan | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
53 | AMAYA Jared C. | D D D V D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
54 | TAPUS Alexandru | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
55 | NG Kenneth | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
55 | CHIN Ryan | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
57 | PARKER Kainoa | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
58 | ZUO Ethan | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
59 | WACHTEL Oliver | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
60 | GREEN Kieran | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.