San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NAGIMOV Marsel | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 74% |
| 2 | BANERJEE Anup | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% | |
| 3 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
| 5 | LIN Dashiell | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
| 5 | JEON Caleb A. | - | - | - | 5% | 36% | 59% | |
| 7 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
| 8 | SOMERS Sean | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 14% | |
| 9 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 48% | 34% |
| 10 | DANKAR Neel | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% | |
| 11 | LO Conrad | - | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
| 12 | NG Eben S. | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 49% | 30% |
| 13 | WONG Nicholas A. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 14 | LIM Charles Q. | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 32% | 2% | |
| 15 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | - | 1% | 16% | 54% | 30% | |
| 16 | DETERING Julian | - | - | 2% | 14% | 47% | 31% | 6% |
| 17 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 18 | HOU Kenneth | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | LAI Christopher W. | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 41% | 12% | |
| 20 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% | |
| 21 | MILLER Duncan R. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% | |
| 22 | CHEN Bryce | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 36% | 5% |
| 23 | HUANG Bernard | - | 6% | 30% | 45% | 17% | 2% | |
| 24 | KHER Roan | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | |
| 25 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 26 | MU Jeffrey | 2% | 21% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 27 | HE Bu Wei O. | 3% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% | - | |
| 28 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | |
| 29 | UPENDER Sky | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | UZGIRIS Kovas | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 31 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 32 | CHOPRA Rohan A. | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | HARRIS Otto | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | CHUANG Kian J. | 1% | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 35 | BAO Aaron | 4% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 36 | WILT Daniel E. | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 37 | TANG Adrian | 1% | 10% | 37% | 42% | 9% | - | |
| 38 | BARTELS Milo | 12% | 43% | 37% | 8% | - | - | |
| 38 | YEE Johnathan | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | FINNEY Lorenz | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 1% | |
| 41 | BELANGER Jackson | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | WOO Christian | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 43 | CRACRAFT John R. | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 3% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 3% | 25% | 45% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | ZENG Chuyi | 5% | 30% | 43% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | KIM Ryan Y. | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | WONG Louis | 29% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | LIN Richard | 41% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | < 1% | 2% | 16% | 47% | 32% | 3% |
| 52 | TEH Ryan | 4% | 38% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | AMAYA Jared C. | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | TAPUS Alexandru | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | NG Kenneth | 17% | 52% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 55 | CHIN Ryan | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | PARKER Kainoa | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 58 | ZUO Ethan | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | WACHTEL Oliver | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | GREEN Kieran | 12% | 38% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.