San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | BANERJEE Anup | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
2 | COELHO Cristiano P. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
3 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
3 | LO Conrad | V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
5 | NG Eben S. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
6 | MA Andrew | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
7 | ZHANG Jiening G. | V V V D D | V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
8 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | V D D D D | V V V D | 4.4 | 1 | -3.4 |
9 | WOO Christian | V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
10 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
11 | WU Lucas | D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
12 | HOSKERI Anik S. | V V D V V | V V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
13 | WANG Ethan | D V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
14 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
15 | BAO Aaron | D V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
16 | CHIN Ryan | V D V V D | V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
17 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
18 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
19 | TUAN Evan | V V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
20 | ZUO Ethan | V V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
21 | FINNEY Lorenz | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
22 | LYNCH Owen C. | V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
23 | WYMAN Julian | V V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
24 | ZENG Chuyi | V D V V D | V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
25 | CHENG Jonathan | V D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
26 | MA Bryant | V V D D V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
27 | TAPUS Andrei | D D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
28 | SEO Shawn | D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
29 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | D V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
30 | RANJITH Yash M. | D D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
31 | VALOUEV Aleksey | D D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
32 | CHEN Justin K. | V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
33 | TEH Ryan | V D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
34 | LI Jett | D D V V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
35 | SHEN Owen | D D V V V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
36 | TONKOVICH Ryan | V V V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
37 | KIM Ryan Y. | D D V V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
38 | MAK Osman K. | V V D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
39 | MYERS Dean | V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
40 | CAZALET George | D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
41 | RUBIN Max | D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
42 | LO Preston | D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
43 | MIN Lucas | D D V V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
45 | GREGORY Henry F. | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
46 | MCCORMACK WILCOX Braeden | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
48 | RAMOS Owen | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
49 | ZHANG Luke | V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
50 | LAURIMAA Emil | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
51 | FRANC Geoffrey C. | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
52 | LING Eddie | D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
53 | AGRAWAL Niki | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
54 | RASMUSSEN Sage | D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
55 | CHU Colin | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
56 | UHLIG Cole | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
56 | ZWICKER Jacob | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
56 | CHAN Connor | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
59 | CHEN Tyler | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.