San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BANERJEE Anup | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 2 | COELHO Cristiano P. | - | - | - | - | 13% | 86% |
| 3 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
| 3 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | - | 4% | 96% |
| 5 | NG Eben S. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 48% | 39% |
| 6 | MA Andrew | - | - | 5% | 26% | 50% | 19% |
| 7 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
| 8 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | < 1% | 1% | 11% | 40% | 49% |
| 9 | WOO Christian | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% |
| 10 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 11 | WU Lucas | - | - | 3% | 24% | 65% | 8% |
| 12 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 13 | WANG Ethan | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 14 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
| 15 | BAO Aaron | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 16 | CHIN Ryan | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 17 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 41% | 16% |
| 18 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 42% | 11% |
| 19 | TUAN Evan | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 20 | ZUO Ethan | - | 6% | 26% | 45% | 23% | - |
| 21 | FINNEY Lorenz | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 22 | LYNCH Owen C. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 49% | 32% |
| 23 | WYMAN Julian | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | ZENG Chuyi | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | CHENG Jonathan | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
| 26 | MA Bryant | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 27 | TAPUS Andrei | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 28 | SEO Shawn | 2% | 16% | 41% | 36% | 6% | - |
| 29 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 4% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 30 | RANJITH Yash M. | 1% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | CHEN Justin K. | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | TEH Ryan | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | - |
| 34 | LI Jett | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 35 | SHEN Owen | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
| 36 | TONKOVICH Ryan | - | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 37 | KIM Ryan Y. | 9% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | MAK Osman K. | 1% | 12% | 52% | 31% | 4% | - |
| 39 | MYERS Dean | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 40 | CAZALET George | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | RUBIN Max | 12% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 42 | LO Preston | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 43 | MIN Lucas | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | GREGORY Henry F. | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | MCCORMACK WILCOX Braeden | 1% | 20% | 44% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 48 | RAMOS Owen | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 49 | ZHANG Luke | 28% | 46% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | LAURIMAA Emil | 12% | 43% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 51 | FRANC Geoffrey C. | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | LING Eddie | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 53 | AGRAWAL Niki | 37% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
| 55 | CHU Colin | 35% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | UHLIG Cole | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 56 | ZWICKER Jacob | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | CHAN Connor | 10% | 46% | 37% | 7% | - | - |
| 59 | CHEN Tyler | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.