Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 2 | SPIER Julian H. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | MITEV Alexander | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | BOSS Evan | V V D V V | V V V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 5 | CURTY Jack | V D V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 6 | BORISENKO Samuel | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 7 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | V D V V D D | V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 8 | GRAVES Lawson | D V D D D V | V V V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 9 | HUANG Kenneth | V V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
| 10 | LEHNER Brian | V V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 11 | SWENSON Keane J. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 12 | ROWLAND Marsden | D V V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 13 | SIEDOW William | V D V V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 14 | BISSEN Quinn | V D V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 15 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | V V V D D D | V V D | 5.6 | 3 | -2.6 |
| 16 | BUTTA Reese | V D D V D D | V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 17 | BENACK Steven M. | V V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 18 | MCDOWELL Will | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 19 | JOHNSON Jay | V V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 20 | DADE MAXIMUS | D V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 21 | SWENSON Diego | V V D V V | V D | 0.7 | 4 | +3.3 |
| 22 | BEACH John | V V D V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 23 | BLAT Robert | V V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 24 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | D V V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 25 | FELICIANO Damien | D D V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 26 | KRAJ Pawel | V D D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 27 | KIM Remington | D V D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 28 | SNYDER Alex | V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | SINAI Nathan G. | V D D D V | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 30 | THOMSON Champa | D D D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 31 | GLEN Ethan | D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 32 | HONG Daniel | D D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 33 | KENT Dwain | V V V V V D | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 34 | SAYLOR Henry | V V D V D V | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 35 | VIDOR Caio | D V V D V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 36 | SHI Yeyu | D V V V D D | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 37 | WANG Kaiyan | D D V V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 38 | CONKLIN Jim | D V D V D V | D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
| 39 | WILLIAMS Logan | D V V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 40 | HERRERA Xavier | V D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 41 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | V D D V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 42 | LARSON Vaughn | V D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 43 | NASSOS Eric | D D V D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 44 | CAMPBELL Finn | D D D V D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 45 | SLEZAK Christian | V V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 46 | JERDEE Colton | V D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 47 | HUGHES Michael D. | D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 48 | MACGREGOR Grant | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 49 | SWANSON Dave | D D D D V D | D | 4.0 | 1 | -3.0 |
| 50 | DRAWZ Chase | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 51 | SAYLOR Nathaniel | D V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 52 | YANG Junhu | D D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 53 | AU Joshua | D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 54 | TIERNEY Luke | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 54 | ALLEN David | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 56 | MILLER Lance W. | D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| 57 | ALI Adam | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 58 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | D D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.