Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 27% |
2 | GIBSON Dylan A. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
3 | TUCKER Owen J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
3 | ZUBECK Dominic | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
5 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
6 | LEHR William D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 24% | |
7 | LEE Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% |
8 | XIANG HONGYI | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
9 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | |
10 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
11 | PARK Jong-Eun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
12 | BUYANOV Nikita V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | |
13 | WANG William M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
14 | CHUNG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
15 | WEISE Eli S. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
16 | WONG Joshua | 100% | 94% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | |
17 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% | |
17 | DE JONG Thijmen J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 24% | |
19 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
20 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | |
21 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% | |
22 | KENT Matthew | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
23 | STONE Henry J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
24 | DYER Ian E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
25 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
26 | LI Sui Lun (Phillip) | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
27 | FAN Beichen | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
28 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 14% | |
29 | LAWLER Aidan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
30 | CRANE Matthew T. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
31 | SHIV Rishi | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
32 | OSBORN Matthew W. | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
33 | ROMERO Caleb E. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
34 | HONG James | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
35 | DIB Aaniss | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
36 | LAI Coby | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
37 | LI Brian X | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 23% | |
38 | STEELE Frank A. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
39 | RASMUSSEN Jack | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - |
40 | VELO Juan Manuel H. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
40 | ALTUVE Alejandro J. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
42 | BAKER Jefferson G. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
42 | CHANG Luo Jixiu | 100% | 78% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
42 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% | |
45 | PITZEL John E. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
45 | GOLDMAN Rami | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
47 | KOH Tommy | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
48 | DOUGLAS Colin F. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
49 | JACKSON James | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
50 | TAYLOR William | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
51 | DENNIS Ethan | 100% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
52 | WEIST Spencer | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
53 | GREGORY Dean | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
54 | COONROD Anthony (Tony) J. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
55 | RHEA Eric L. | 100% | 75% | 27% | 3% | - | - | |
56 | CHRISTIAN John R. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
57 | WILLIAMS Richard | 100% | 62% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
58 | BRUS Brian V. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
59 | KOPPE Benjamin | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
60 | FITZGERALD Thomas R. | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
61 | YAO Shun | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
61 | GAURIAT Olivier | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
63 | KIRSCH Adam J. | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
64 | MILLER Lance W. | 100% | 91% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.