Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
| 2 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 3 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 3 | TANG Luke | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
| 5 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | |
| 6 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% | |
| 7 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
| 8 | ROFINO Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
| 9 | BURDICK Elijah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
| 10 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% | |
| 11 | CHEN Cameron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 12 | LEE Elijah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 5% | |
| 13 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 14 | HOLBROOK Silas | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 15 | LI Tyrese | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 16 | FLANNICK Cole | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 17 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | < 1% | |
| 18 | GILLARD Adan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 3% | |
| 19 | CHO Adrian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% | |
| 20 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | ASHLEY Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 22 | KABA Elias | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
| 22 | LIN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | |
| 24 | CHEN Hayden | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% | |
| 25 | LAKSHMAN Vishnu | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 26 | LIU Easun | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
| 28 | LI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 5% | |
| 29 | ZHU Brady | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 30 | MA Joseph | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 31 | RICHARDSON Matthew | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 32 | PRUSHIK-LADIN Dan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | - | |
| 33 | ROBINSON Blake | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 34 | CIANCHETTA David | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 35 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 4% | |
| 36 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
| 36 | REZENDE Lucas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 38 | GREGORY Milo | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | MANUEL Eli | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 40 | BRATU Max | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 41 | RICK Dylan | 100% | 92% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | AN Remi | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 43 | YOON Jonathan | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | NOVAK Luke | 100% | 89% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | JEONG Joseph | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | PINCIROLI Tommaso | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 47 | ACHILOV Murod | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 48 | LI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 38% | 5% |
| 49 | GUO zhaohong | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | CHANG Connor | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 51 | LIU George | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 52 | RUDIGER George | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 53 | KESELMAN Ron | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 54 | ZHENG Yicheng Will | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 55 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 56 | SULLIVAN Dennis | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 5% | |
| 57 | MILOWSKY Majai | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 58 | YONG Connor | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 59 | ECCLESTONE Liam | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | MATHEW Benjamin | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 61 | YADAV Aarav | 100% | 92% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | SON Joshua | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | LANDMAN Martin | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | YU MAXIMILIAN | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 65 | LI Alexander | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 67 | HERIGSTAD Daniel | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 67 | NAGELHOUT Cole | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.