Treasure Island YMCA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | EVANS Desmond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% |
| 2 | LIU Zichen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% |
| 3 | YU Jinyuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 3 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
| 5 | SLAIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
| 6 | AGARWAL Jagrav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 7 | LI Yunze | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% | |
| 8 | RAJ Yojith | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 9 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | |
| 10 | DING Sam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 11% |
| 11 | KAJITA Grayson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 11% | |
| 12 | YAN Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 13 | MENG Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 58% | 16% | 1% |
| 14 | JUE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% | |
| 15 | SCHOR William | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 16 | SITU Baiqin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% | |
| 17 | LIN Zhengxuan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 18 | LI Mason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% |
| 19 | CHENG Alvin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 20 | MANANSALA Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | 1% |
| 21 | LI Lief | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 22 | BHOOMI Abhiram | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 23 | NGUYEN Norris | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 24 | LIN Dylan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 25 | ZHANG Bryant | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 26 | ZHANG Charlie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 1% |
| 27 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 28 | GEMBALA Theodore | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 29 | HO Kasper | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 30 | CHOI William | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 31 | XIE Garrett | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | TIKHONOV Aleksandr | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 33 | FUNG Caleb | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | 1% | |
| 34 | FUNG Lucas | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | WANG Ian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 36 | JACOBE Jakyn | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ZHENG Ivan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 38 | WONG Sebastian | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | DONG YIKUN | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | ANDERSON Stellan | 100% | 83% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | CHOU Noel | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 42 | ZHONG Dexter | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 6% | - |
| 43 | HERNANDEZ Oliver | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 44 | LUI Jamie | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 45 | LEE Harry | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 46 | SPICER-YOUAKIM Benjamin | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | WONG Kingston | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | SINGH Shiv | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 49 | MAK Avery | 100% | 61% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | KIM Owen | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | COOK Owen | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 52 | KAUDER Rourke | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 53 | ZENG Cayden | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 54 | YANG Jaron | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 55 | PHILLIPS Julian | 100% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | LIM Xander-Zain | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | SHANG Jason | 100% | 59% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | LIN Cyrus | 100% | 64% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.