Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DOOLEY Atticus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 2 | ZEYU wu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
| 3 | LEE Nathan Uju | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
| 3 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 5 | LUC Linkin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% |
| 6 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
| 7 | CHAN Troy Devon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | |
| 8 | SLOAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 20% | 1% | |
| 9 | KIM Enoch | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
| 10 | TENG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% | |
| 11 | BRIMMER Robert (Trey) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | |
| 12 | GATTO Enzo P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 13 | PI Edwin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 2% |
| 14 | AN Chris | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | |
| 15 | SUN Eon | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 7% | ||
| 16 | KIM Suin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | |
| 17 | LOPEZ Mateo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 18 | XIE Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 14% |
| 19 | TANG Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
| 20 | FISCHER Noel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 21 | SUN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 26% |
| 22 | CHEN Zhengming | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 7% | |
| 23 | WARD Carter | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 24 | YANG Jake | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 3% | |
| 25 | ZHANG KAIQI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | |
| 26 | LIN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 7% | |
| 27 | WONG Ron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% | ||
| 28 | HAN Kyle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 29 | LIU Clarence | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 30 | SAHA Aadi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | LVOVSKIY Roman | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
| 32 | OU Rigel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 33 | KIM Leo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 5% | |
| 34 | LO Elroy | 100% | 82% | 37% | 7% | - | ||
| 35 | CHEN Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
| 36 | SAHA Aryan | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | GONZALEZ Paul | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
| 38 | FUGATE Logan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% | |
| 39 | CHOI LIAM | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
| 40 | DENG Richard | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 3% | |
| 41 | RAPHAEL Pierson | 100% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 42 | QI Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 12% |
| 43 | DESAI Arthav | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 44 | LEE Alexander | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 46 | WANG James | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 47 | KUNIMOTO Adam | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 48 | LIU Baichen (Matthew) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | LEE Winston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 50 | QI Zach | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 51 | WANG David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 51 | RHODES Bryce | 100% | 94% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | SUN alan | 100% | 98% | 79% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
| 54 | PARK Jayden | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 22% | 1% | |
| 55 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 22% | 1% | |
| 56 | SU Eric | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 57 | KIM Noah | 100% | 79% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 58 | MOROAICA Seiku | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
| 59 | HORN Diodorus | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 60 | TONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 61 | LEE Jayden Junhyuk | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 19% | 2% |
| 62 | GOTTSCHALK Theodore | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | |
| 63 | LOVELL Jackson | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 64 | NGUYEN Ethan | 100% | 98% | 76% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 65 | CHEUNG Evan | 100% | 94% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 67 | LAM Ethan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 68 | LEI Isaac | 100% | 87% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 69 | RAMOS Pious | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 70 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 71 | HUNG Jaden | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 72 | WU Allen | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 73 | LAMORI Matt | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 74 | HIROTA Jackson | 100% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | EKAMBARAM Rithik | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | ||
| 76 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 77 | DING Orlando | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 78 | HSIEH Maxwell | 100% | 89% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 78 | HSIEH Sebastian | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 80 | CHEN Dylan | 100% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 81 | HIROTA Mitchell | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 82 | JUNG Andres | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 83 | LIU Paul | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 9% | - | |
| 84 | FERRING Theo | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 85 | DOUGLAS Milo | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 86 | LOH Dylan | 100% | 74% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 87 | BODO John | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | XIN Ryan | 100% | 95% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 89 | WU Dustin | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 90 | PHAN Ethan | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 91 | HSU Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 70% | 21% | 2% | ||
| 92 | ZHANG Connery | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 93 | HULL Eason | 100% | 65% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 94 | GUO ATTICUS | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 95 | DUGGIREDDY Ronav | 100% | 53% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 96 | CHEN Maorui | 100% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 97 | CHAN Ethan | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.