January SJCC

Cadet Men's Épée

Friday, January 23, 2026 at 1:30 PM

Renasant Convention Center - Memphis, TN, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 WANG Joey V D V V D V V V V V V V V 4.8 4 -0.8
2 GUMEDELLI Mohnish V V V V V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
3 LAI Boden D V V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
3 DODIN Daniel M. D D V D V V V V V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
5 TSE Maxwell V V V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
6 SIEDOW William D V V V V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
7 BOUDREAUX James V D V V D V V V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
8 LI Yunji (Rain) D V V D D V V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
9 LAM Alan V V D V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
10 LI Jade V V V D V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
11 JAIN Samyak D V V V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
13 MORIN-JIANG Jake V D D V V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
14 KIM Ian D V V V D V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
15 ZIEGLER John V V V D D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
16 MIDYANY Evan V V D V D D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
17 NAKAS Levent V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
18 HUANG Kenneth V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
19 DOUBOV Andrew V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
20 CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) V V V V V D V D 4.9 5 +0.1
21 XIA Dashan V V V D V V V V 5.2 5 -0.2
22 LU Jacob D V V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
23 VOO Lucas D V V V V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
24 NORMILE Nicholas V V V V D D V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
25 QIAN Irvine V V V D V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
26 SHCHUR Grayson V V D V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
27 DONG Haiyi(Leo) V V V D V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
28 SATISHKUMAR Pranav V D D V V V V V D 1.8 4 +2.2
29 WU Johnny y. V D V D V D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
30 HSU Joshua D D V V D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
31 FU Nolan D D D D V V V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
32 ROSADO Balthazar Francisco D D D D V V V D 2.4 1 -1.4
33 TAI Edison V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
34 JEONG Arisu V V V D V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
35 GINZBURG Adam V V V V D V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
36 SINGH Ravin V D V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
37 GACIOCH Noah V V D V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
38 TRAN Spencer V D V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
39 LEE Aiden V V D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
40 HELMY Richard D V V V D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
41 O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar V D D V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
42 CORBIN Bennett V V V D D V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
43 ZHANG Austin V V V D D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
44 WANG Devin V D D V V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
45 LEE DoWon V V D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
46 SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN D D V V V V 3.7 3 -0.7
47 ADDLEMAN Joshua V D V D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
48 ZHANG Lucas D V D V V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
49 SINGLETON Aman V V V D D D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
50 PARKER Isaiah V V D D V D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
51 MEHROTRA Neel D D V D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
52 KIM Alexander D V D V D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
53 AHMED Mohsen D D V V V D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
54 GLUSHKOV David V D V D V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
55 CHEN Jayden V D V D D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
56 JOHNSON Soren V D D D V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
57 LEE Anton D V V D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
58 HERNDON Liam Herndon V D V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
59 GAO Victor V D D D V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
60 LIU Adam D V D V D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
61 LIU Andy D D D V V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
62 MOORE Alexander D D D V V D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
63 KIM Gene D V D V D D V D 4.2 2 -2.2
64 GAO Ryan V D V D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
65 ZHU Yiming V V D V D V D 2.4 4 +1.6
66 RONG Gordon V D V D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
67 KIM Henry V V V D V D D 4.6 4 -0.6
68 LEE Royce V D D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
69 LIANG Donny V D V D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
70 ZHANG Kwan Fei(Albert) D V V V D D 2.2 3 +0.8
71 KROPP Wesley V V D D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
72 VAN JAARSVELD Leo D V V D D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
73 YI Nathan D D V V V D D 3.5 3 -0.5
74 KIM Doyun V V D V D D D 1.4 3 +1.6
75 MUENKE Magnus D V D V V D D 4.0 3 -1.0
76 YANG Gary D V D V V D D 3.8 3 -0.8
77 RONG Marcus D D V D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
78 CHO Alex D V D D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
79 KONG Brandon D V V D D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
80 YAO Tristan V D V V D D D 2.1 3 +0.9
80 YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki D D D V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
82 HERDMAN Julian D V V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
83 AYOTTE James D V D V V D D 3.3 3 -0.3
84 KIM Remington D V D V D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
85 WU Steven V D D V D D 3.5 2 -1.5
86 GOROZA Eric D V V D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
87 LI Grayson D D V V D D 1.7 2 +0.3
88 LEE Aiden V V D D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
89 SATHYAN Dev V D D D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
90 ALI Farhan V D D V D D 3.8 2 -1.8
91 LIDSKY Phineas D D V V D D D 3.5 2 -1.5
92 LOISEAU Oscar V D D V D D D 4.2 2 -2.2
92 TANG Daniel V D D D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
94 SHIM Jae V D D D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
95 KUSACTAY Eric D V D V D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
96 TANEJA ARNAV D D D V D V D 0.4 2 +1.6
97 PARKE Nathaniel D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
98 HE Bronto V D D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
99 CHANG Matthew D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
100 CARPENTER Touma S. D D V D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
101 ZHENG Jason D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
102 CHO Adrian D D D V D D 1.1 1 -0.1
103 SAVORETTI Pietro V D D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
104 WU Matthew D D D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
105 GADHVI Darius D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
106 BENNETT Pierce D D V D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
107 KARLEKAR Veer D V D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
108 KIM Julian D V D D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
109 CHEN Jayden D D V D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
110 SCHIPPER Johann D D D V D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
111 SUN Jiarui (Jerry) D D D V D D 1.1 1 -0.1
112 WANG Marcus D D D D V D D 0.7 1 +0.3
113 LEE Lucas D D D V D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
114 SHIN Ryan D D D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
115 MOSLEY Wally D V D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
116 ZHAN ETHAN D D D D D V D 0.8 1 +0.2
117 HUANG Ethan D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
118 HADSKEY Rowan D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
119 LIU Yihong D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
120 REYNOLDS CHANG Luke D D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.