Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SHARMA Sanil | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
2 | CAI Kevin P. | V V V V D V | V V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
3 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | V D V D V D | V V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
3 | YULE Alexander L. | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
5 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
6 | SHUR Yakov C. | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
7 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
8 | KULIGOWSKI Bartosz | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
9 | KIM PAUL | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
10 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
11 | AU Marcus J. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
12 | IVE Isaac L. | V V D V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
13 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
14 | ANDERSON Elias W. | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
15 | MILOSLAVSKY Jack | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
16 | KIM Benjamin I. | V D D D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
17 | SHAMIS Mark | V V V V V V | D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
18 | COOPER Rowan | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
19 | GARRETT Samuel | V V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
20 | BHARGAV Siddharth | V V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
21 | JIN daniel | V V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
22 | WEAVER Neil | V D V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
23 | LIU Andrew | V V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
24 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | V D D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
25 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | D V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
26 | WONG Nathan | D V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
27 | HOLDERNESS Landon | D V D D V V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
28 | PALLI Maximillian | V D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
29 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
30 | WICKBOLDT Eric | V D D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
31 | HWANG Samuel W. | D D V V D D | V | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
32 | TAMHANKAR Neil | D D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
33 | MONDALA Adrian | V D V D V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
34 | HUSSAIN Kamran | D V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
35 | SIVAGAR Leo | D D V D V V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
36 | BARRY Dominick | V D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
37 | WRIGHT Christopher | V V D D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
38 | KOPPE Benjamin | V D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
39 | KATZ Matheo | V D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
40 | STENNIS Brendan | D V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
41 | SOLTER Kai | D V D D V D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
42 | ZHANG Alec | D V D D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
43 | SARKAR agniv | V D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
44 | KOH Tommy | D D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
44 | SARKAR Anish | V D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
46 | GOLDMAN Rami | D V D D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
47 | MILEY Nick N. | V D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
48 | MING Nathan | D D V V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
49 | LAU Matthew | D V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
50 | ULINICH Alexander | D V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
51 | BAGCHI Aritra | D V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
52 | AHMED saheer | D D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
53 | KOPPE Alexander | V D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
54 | ZHUANG William | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
55 | WILLIS Alan T. | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
56 | PATERSON Owen | D D D D D V | 0.1 | 1 | +0.9 | |
57 | ARUN Madhav | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
58 | ONTIVEROS Miller | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
59 | FINE Gabriel | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
59 | WATT Darren | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
61 | MOFFATT Bryson | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
62 | QUIROGA Kyle | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
62 | LAI Aaron | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.