Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHARMA Sanil | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
2 | CAI Kevin P. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
3 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
3 | YULE Alexander L. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
5 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% |
6 | SHUR Yakov C. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
7 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
8 | KULIGOWSKI Bartosz | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
9 | KIM PAUL | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
10 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
11 | AU Marcus J. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% |
12 | IVE Isaac L. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
13 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 26% |
14 | ANDERSON Elias W. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
15 | MILOSLAVSKY Jack | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
16 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
17 | SHAMIS Mark | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
18 | COOPER Rowan | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
19 | GARRETT Samuel | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
20 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 2% | 15% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
21 | JIN daniel | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
22 | WEAVER Neil | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
23 | LIU Andrew | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
24 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
25 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 4% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | WONG Nathan | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
27 | HOLDERNESS Landon | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% |
28 | PALLI Maximillian | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
29 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
30 | WICKBOLDT Eric | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
31 | HWANG Samuel W. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
32 | TAMHANKAR Neil | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | MONDALA Adrian | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
34 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
35 | SIVAGAR Leo | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
36 | BARRY Dominick | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
37 | WRIGHT Christopher | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
38 | KOPPE Benjamin | 6% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
39 | KATZ Matheo | 1% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
40 | STENNIS Brendan | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
41 | SOLTER Kai | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
42 | ZHANG Alec | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
43 | SARKAR agniv | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
44 | KOH Tommy | 2% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
44 | SARKAR Anish | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
46 | GOLDMAN Rami | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
47 | MILEY Nick N. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
48 | MING Nathan | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
49 | LAU Matthew | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
50 | ULINICH Alexander | 16% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
51 | BAGCHI Aritra | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
52 | AHMED saheer | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
53 | KOPPE Alexander | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
54 | ZHUANG William | 1% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
55 | WILLIS Alan T. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
56 | PATERSON Owen | 91% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
57 | ARUN Madhav | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
58 | ONTIVEROS Miller | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
59 | FINE Gabriel | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
59 | WATT Darren | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
61 | MOFFATT Bryson | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
62 | QUIROGA Kyle | 52% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | LAI Aaron | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.