Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHARMA Sanil | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 2 | CAI Kevin P. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
| 3 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 3 | YULE Alexander L. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
| 5 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% |
| 6 | SHUR Yakov C. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 7 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
| 8 | KULIGOWSKI Bartosz | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 9 | KIM PAUL | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 10 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 11 | AU Marcus J. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% |
| 12 | IVE Isaac L. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 13 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 26% |
| 14 | ANDERSON Elias W. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | MILOSLAVSKY Jack | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 17 | SHAMIS Mark | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 18 | COOPER Rowan | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
| 19 | GARRETT Samuel | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 20 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 2% | 15% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 21 | JIN daniel | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
| 22 | WEAVER Neil | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | LIU Andrew | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 25 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 4% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | WONG Nathan | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | HOLDERNESS Landon | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% |
| 28 | PALLI Maximillian | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 29 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | WICKBOLDT Eric | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 31 | HWANG Samuel W. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
| 32 | TAMHANKAR Neil | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | MONDALA Adrian | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 34 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 35 | SIVAGAR Leo | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 36 | BARRY Dominick | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | WRIGHT Christopher | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | KOPPE Benjamin | 6% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | KATZ Matheo | 1% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | STENNIS Brendan | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | SOLTER Kai | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 42 | ZHANG Alec | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | SARKAR agniv | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | KOH Tommy | 2% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | SARKAR Anish | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | GOLDMAN Rami | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 47 | MILEY Nick N. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | MING Nathan | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | LAU Matthew | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | ULINICH Alexander | 16% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | BAGCHI Aritra | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 52 | AHMED saheer | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | KOPPE Alexander | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 54 | ZHUANG William | 1% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | WILLIS Alan T. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | PATERSON Owen | 91% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | ARUN Madhav | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | ONTIVEROS Miller | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | FINE Gabriel | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | WATT Darren | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | MOFFATT Bryson | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 62 | QUIROGA Kyle | 52% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 62 | LAI Aaron | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.