Canlan Sports Libertyville - Libertyville, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | VAN RIET Stefan | V D V V V D | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 2 | GRIGORENKO Gleb | V V V D V V | V V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | ZHOU Zhi Matthew | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 3 | CARPENTER Touma S. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 5 | MITTELSTAEDT Isaiah | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 6 | HERDMAN Julian | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 7 | ELLIS, IV Floyd | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 8 | YAKHNIS Seth | V D V D V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | LUO Alexander | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 10 | GOODMAN Liam | V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 11 | TUMULA Arihaan | V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | D V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 13 | FONG Kobe | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 14 | YAO Aiden | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | BHANDARE Veer | D V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | KUYKENDALL Logan | V V V D D D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 17 | KICIMAN Leo | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 18 | YAO Ryan | V V V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 19 | WANG Eason | V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 20 | KIM Doyun | V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 21 | D'SA Thomas | V V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 22 | DANG William | V D V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 23 | CHEN Linus | V D V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 24 | LEE James K. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 25 | DING Max | V D V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 26 | PETERS Keane | D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 28 | CHIANG William | D V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 29 | WYCHULIS Tristan | V V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 30 | LEE Leo | V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 31 | PERRY Noah | V V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 32 | MA Joseph | D D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 33 | LIU Maximilian | V V V D V D | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 34 | NICHOLAS Miles | D V V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 35 | PARK Ethan | V D V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 36 | KUYKENDALL Lucas | V D D V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 37 | RAU Shogun | V D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 38 | CHINTA Vivaan | V D V V D | D | 0.5 | 3 | +2.5 |
| 39 | KESELMAN Ron | V V V D | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 40 | JIN Noah | D D V D V V | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 | |
| 41 | ROBERTS Arthur | V D D V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 42 | HANTOV Adrian | D V D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 43 | CARPENTER Taisei | V D D V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 44 | MUNOZ Rocco | V V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 45 | KRAVCHENKO Philip | V D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 46 | KICIMAN Louis | D V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 47 | CROSSETT Peter | D V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 48 | HERIGSTAD Daniel | D D V V D D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 48 | TALANDZEVICIUS Tomas | D V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 50 | MILOWSKY Majai | D V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 51 | PRONIEWSKI Julian | D V D D D V | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 52 | DEVISETTY Sohun | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 53 | ZHANG Eric | D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 54 | VANAMA Agastya | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 55 | PURUSHOTHAM Neil | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 56 | MBERIA Henry | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 57 | FILKOV Timur | D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 57 | FRANK Luke | D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 59 | QU ethan | D D D V D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 60 | KLOTS Theo | D D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 61 | REYNOLDS CHANG Luke | V D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 62 | PAGLIARINI James | D D V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 63 | ABEZGAUZ Ariel | D D D V D D | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 64 | MITTELSTAEDT EJ | D D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 65 | KIM Siwoo | D D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 66 | ANDREWS Elliott | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 67 | CHEN Regis | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 68 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 69 | SLAVIN Tamir | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 70 | DIERKING Cameron | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 71 | LEE Wilson | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.