Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | WIMMER Chandler M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 2 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% |
| 3 | RINEHART Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
| 3 | LEE Timothy S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 5 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 6 | PICCUS Isaac S. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 7 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 8 | KIM Edward J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 9 | KIM Minjun | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 3% |
| 10 | PLUMER Jack E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
| 11 | ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) | 100% | 92% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 12 | CHEN Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 13 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 14 | LIU John | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 15 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% |
| 16 | CRANE Matthew T. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | YIM Alex | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 21% | |
| 18 | YOON Nathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 19 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 20 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 21 | MIN MARCUS | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 22 | RODRIGUEZ Ryan | 100% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
| 23 | STUBBLEFIELD Alexander | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | HODGE Jaydon L. | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 25 | SALISBURY Cary | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | FREEMAN Daniel H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 27 | STEVENS Daniel | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 28 | XIA Owen | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | JOSEPH William | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 31 | COUGHLIN Nolan E. | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 89% | 52% | 14% | 1% | |
| 33 | SHAH Anuj | 100% | 88% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | YI Jason | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | LU Sebastian X. | 100% | 91% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.