Cleveland State University - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | ||
| 2 | OSMAN TOUSON Maruan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 7% | 15% | 23% | 25% | 17% | 7% | 1% | ||
| 3 | IMREK Elijah | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 2% | 6% | 11% | 17% | 20% | 19% | 13% | 7% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 3 | HAMILTON-MEIKLE Jonathan | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 7% | 15% | 22% | 23% | 18% | 9% | 3% | - | ||
| 5 | KULCSAR Viktor | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 9% | 18% | 24% | 22% | 14% | 6% | 1% | - | ||
| 6 | BUELAU Matthew | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 10% | 17% | 21% | 21% | 15% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | ||
| 7 | STANGE Jakob | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 2% | 6% | 13% | 19% | 22% | 19% | 12% | 5% | 1% | - | - | |
| 8 | KROPP Jack | - | - | 1% | 2% | 7% | 13% | 19% | 21% | 17% | 11% | 6% | 2% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 9 | SHAH S Ayush | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 10% | 16% | 20% | 20% | 15% | 8% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | FIAMINGO Francisco | 1% | 7% | 18% | 26% | 23% | 15% | 7% | 2% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 11 | PETERSEN Ephraim | 1% | 9% | 21% | 28% | 23% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 12 | ELSAYED Mahmoud | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 7% | 18% | 31% | 30% | 12% | |||||||||
| 14 | RANGEL Arturo | - | 4% | 12% | 24% | 28% | 20% | 9% | 3% | - | - | ||||||||||
| 15 | DINKINS Shuayb | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |||||||||||
| 16 | GIBSON Nowell L. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 26% | 30% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - | ||||||||||
| 17 | CHENH Justin | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||
| 18 | HEIM Bryce | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - | - | - | |||||||||||
| 19 | SENNEWALD James | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |||||||||||||||
| 20 | RIECK Brennan | 47% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | |||||||||||||||
| 21 | PALLADINO Ben | 46% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
| 22 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 11% | 41% | 42% | 6% | - | |||||||||||||||
| 23 | CHEMEZOV Trent | 29% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | |||||||||||||||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.