Cleveland State University - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | ||
| 2 | OSMAN TOUSON Maruan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 89% | 74% | 50% | 26% | 8% | 1% | ||
| 3 | IMREK Elijah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 91% | 80% | 63% | 42% | 24% | 11% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 3 | HAMILTON-MEIKLE Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 89% | 75% | 53% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | ||
| 5 | KULCSAR Viktor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 86% | 68% | 44% | 22% | 8% | 2% | - | ||
| 6 | BUELAU Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 94% | 84% | 68% | 46% | 25% | 11% | 3% | 1% | - | ||
| 7 | STANGE Jakob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 91% | 78% | 59% | 37% | 18% | 7% | 2% | - | - | |
| 8 | KROPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 90% | 77% | 58% | 37% | 20% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 9 | SHAH S Ayush | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 94% | 84% | 68% | 48% | 29% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | FIAMINGO Francisco | 100% | 99% | 92% | 74% | 48% | 25% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 11 | PETERSEN Ephraim | 100% | 99% | 90% | 69% | 40% | 17% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 12 | ELSAYED Mahmoud | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 92% | 73% | 42% | 12% | |||||||||
| 14 | RANGEL Arturo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 84% | 60% | 33% | 12% | 3% | - | - | ||||||||||
| 15 | DINKINS Shuayb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |||||||||||
| 16 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 84% | 58% | 29% | 9% | 2% | - | ||||||||||
| 17 | CHENH Justin | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||
| 18 | HEIM Bryce | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - | |||||||||||
| 19 | SENNEWALD James | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |||||||||||||||
| 20 | RIECK Brennan | 100% | 53% | 9% | 1% | - | |||||||||||||||
| 21 | PALLADINO Ben | 100% | 54% | 8% | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||
| 22 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 89% | 48% | 6% | - | |||||||||||||||
| 23 | CHEMEZOV Trent | 100% | 71% | 18% | 2% | - | |||||||||||||||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.