Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YIP Allison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% | |
| 2 | CHO Jacey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 3 | LI Anna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |
| 3 | YOON Claire | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 5 | GRAZIANO Ruby Mae | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
| 6 | ERISMAN Gabriella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
| 7 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
| 8 | CIOBANU Celine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 9 | LI Allison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 10 | FU Shannon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
| 11 | CHO Anya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 12 | DYMAR Anna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 13 | LEE Adelynn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 12% |
| 14 | KIM Vivian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 19% | |
| 15 | GARCIA Sophia Noelle | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 16 | MIAO Anthea | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
| 17 | SUN Joanna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 10% | |
| 19 | YANG Nina | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | LU Chloe | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | LYNTON Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | REN Ivanka | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 24 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 27% | |
| 25 | XIE Zhiran (Celine) | 100% | 88% | 35% | 6% | - | - | |
| 26 | FLESHER Mia | 100% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | BUDMAN Ava | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 28 | LICHTENFELD Naomi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | 3% | |
| 29 | YANG Emma | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | LEE Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 31 | KUSHNERENKO Maiia | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | LI Wan-Tao | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 33 | LEONG Andrea | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% | |
| 34 | KOU Cynthia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 12% | |
| 35 | LU Chu | 100% | 98% | 79% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | PARKE Jaime | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 37 | FLYNN Kensington | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | KOHLER Chrissy | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 39 | WANG Olivia | 100% | 77% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | SMIRNOVA Evangelina | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | LAMOREAUX Collette | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | VISHWA Nishta | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | ZU Jacqueline | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 44 | THOMAS Mackenzie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | WANG Kercedes Ye | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 47 | LYNTON Olivia | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 48 | RAPTIS Layla | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 48 | ZHANG Carina | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | HAN Jimin Ellin | 100% | 83% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | FITCH Anna | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | LI Celine | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 53 | LEE Layla | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | LI Carlie | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 55 | YU Jiaming | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 56 | BEATINGO Chelli | 100% | 89% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | CHANG Mikayla | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | WANG Phoebe | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 59 | KLEIN Isabel | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 60 | LI Elaine | 100% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | PUTTAMRAJU Nithya | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.