Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HONG Edwin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 42% |
| 2 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 23% |
| 3 | YE Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 41% |
| 3 | PARK Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 5 | JIN Yucheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% |
| 6 | SANCHEZ MARTINEZ Victor Noel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
| 7 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 8 | YANG Steve | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 9 | WANG Waylon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% |
| 10 | ZHANG Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | ||
| 11 | ZHOU jiatong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 22% |
| 12 | YUNG Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% |
| 13 | CREMEL Remi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 9% |
| 14 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | |
| 15 | HE Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 23% |
| 16 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 21% |
| 17 | SHA Lambor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 7% |
| 18 | ALCAZAREN Cian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 26% |
| 19 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 34% |
| 20 | KAJITA Grayson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | YAN Aaron | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | LEE Ian | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 24 | LIN Sampson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 25 | TEJAKUSUMA Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% | 4% |
| 26 | LEE Colin | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | WANG Eason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | SHAO Tysen | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 29 | PARKS Maxwell | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | TROYANKER Makar | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 31 | LOPES-EASON Liam James | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 33 | WARD MADS | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 34 | MASOOD Rohail | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% |
| 35 | KWONG Colin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | KUK Francis | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | 8% | ||
| 37 | LUO Derren | 100% | 88% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | SINGH Reyaansh | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 39 | CABATO Luca | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 40 | TAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | GU Evan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 42 | LIN Dylan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% | 6% | ||
| 43 | FOO Kingston | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 44 | WONG Connor | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 45 | SEUL Maddox | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 46 | SCHAMP Eliot | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 47 | LITVACK Jackson | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | GOURLEY Jack | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 49 | MA Justin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 50 | KIM Ryan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 50 | TRAN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 52 | THAO Zenji | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | MITCHELL Kallum | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 54 | CHOU Noel | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | NGUYEN Nolan | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | SCHOR William | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 57 | ZUO Thomas | 100% | 53% | 10% | 1% | - | ||
| 58 | ULZIIBOLD Sean | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 59 | KIM Noah | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | GOYAL Arie | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | CHENG Alvin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 62 | NGO Lincoln | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 63 | FALCONE Mateo | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 64 | LE Oliver | 100% | 78% | 27% | 4% | - | ||
| 65 | TSAI Spencer | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 66 | NGUYEN Remy | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 67 | CAO LANDON | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | BHANGOO Arman | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 69 | HUANG Barron | 100% | 98% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 70 | LIU Kingston | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 71 | WANG Andy | 100% | 77% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 72 | LU David | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 73 | BARROW Jackson | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 74 | NELSON Elliott | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 75 | LINTNER-CALVO Julien | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.