Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HANSEN Jonas B. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
2 | ZHANG Joshua | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
3 | MERCHANT Reza H. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
3 | CARPENTER Liam | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
5 | KAMBESELES Peter G. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
6 | KOKENGE Clark | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
7 | WOLF Myles J. | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 12% | |
8 | CHIN Ethan | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
9 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | |
10 | CHA Russell W. | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
11 | BEKKER Mitchel | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
12 | LEIGH David A. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
13 | INSLER Gabriel C. | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
14 | KIM Juni C. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
15 | ZARETSKY Daniel A. | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
16 | MANCINI Christopher M. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
17 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
18 | ANDREEV Arthur | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
19 | POLKOVSKY Dylan S. | - | 5% | 27% | 44% | 23% | 1% | |
20 | GIBSON Nowell L. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
21 | INSLER Ethan C. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 48% | 37% | |
22 | KAMBESELES Jack M. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
23 | LAWSON Henry A. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
24 | ZHENG Hagen | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 30% | 3% | |
25 | PARK Brian | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% | |
26 | MORSE Tyler | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
27 | MOTIR Lucas D. | 10% | 40% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
27 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% | |
29 | MCDERMOTT Brian | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 32% | 5% | |
30 | KIM William M. | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
31 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
32 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 2% | |
33 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
34 | SJOSTEDT Jacob H. | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
35 | BEYRICH Henry J. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
36 | CARVALHO Daniel S. | 8% | 44% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
37 | MAAS Sean H. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
38 | SIDDIQUI HUMZA K. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | |
39 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
40 | MARRAN Erik R. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
41 | DOUGLAS Colin F. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
42 | KRENZ Michal A. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 1% | |
43 | PAK Charles | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
44 | GARVEY Sean | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
45 | LAI Coby | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
46 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
47 | KUMAR Anitya | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
48 | HU Matthew | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
49 | TUCKER Owen J. | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
51 | LI Brian | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
52 | SINGCUENCO Lance | 20% | 43% | 30% | 7% | - | - | |
53 | LEWIS William J. | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
54 | LI Eric | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
55 | CONNORS Jacob | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.