Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HANSEN Jonas B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 2 | ZHANG Joshua | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 3 | MERCHANT Reza H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 3 | CARPENTER Liam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 5 | KAMBESELES Peter G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 6 | KOKENGE Clark | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
| 7 | WOLF Myles J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
| 8 | CHIN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 9 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
| 10 | CHA Russell W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
| 11 | BEKKER Mitchel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
| 12 | LEIGH David A. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 13 | INSLER Gabriel C. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
| 14 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 15 | ZARETSKY Daniel A. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | MANCINI Christopher M. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
| 18 | ANDREEV Arthur | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 19 | POLKOVSKY Dylan S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 24% | 1% | |
| 20 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
| 21 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 37% | |
| 22 | KAMBESELES Jack M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 23 | LAWSON Henry A. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 24 | ZHENG Hagen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | 3% | |
| 25 | PARK Brian | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 26 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
| 27 | MOTIR Lucas D. | 100% | 90% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% | |
| 29 | MCDERMOTT Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 5% | |
| 30 | KIM William M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 31 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 2% | |
| 33 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | |
| 34 | SJOSTEDT Jacob H. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 8% | 1% | |
| 35 | BEYRICH Henry J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | CARVALHO Daniel S. | 100% | 92% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | MAAS Sean H. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
| 38 | SIDDIQUI HUMZA K. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | |
| 39 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | MARRAN Erik R. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
| 41 | DOUGLAS Colin F. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 42 | KRENZ Michal A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 1% | |
| 43 | PAK Charles | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | GARVEY Sean | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 45 | LAI Coby | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 46 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 47 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | HU Matthew | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
| 49 | TUCKER Owen J. | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | LI Brian | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | SINGCUENCO Lance | 100% | 80% | 38% | 7% | - | - | |
| 53 | LEWIS William J. | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | LI Eric | 100% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | CONNORS Jacob | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.