Absolute Clash SYC/RJCC

Y-12 Women's Épée

Sunday, March 29, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Atlantic City Convention Center - Atlantic City, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CHOI Arianna 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 67%
2 LEE Zoe 100% 99% 94% 71% 33% 7% < 1%
3 CHEN Madeline 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 42%
3 KIM Charlotte 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 21%
5 LIU Brinley 100% 100% 99% 95% 79% 46% 13%
6 LI Kayla 100% 100% 98% 85% 48% 11%
7 SIU Mila 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 21% 3%
8 YIN Elaine 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 48% 14%
9 BOUTSIKARIS Asha 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 20%
10 FURMAN Elizabeth 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 27%
11 VILLER Alice 100% 100% 100% 98% 81% 38%
12 TANG Jacquelyn 100% 99% 93% 72% 35% 8%
13 YOUNG Penelope 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 41% 10%
14 ZHAO Rachel 100% 100% 100% 96% 74% 32% 4%
15 ZHANG Allison 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 51% 11%
16 CHALLAMEL Heloise 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 29% 5%
17 CHEN Laila 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 12%
18 PATEL Aria 100% 100% 98% 86% 49% 12%
19 LEE Nicole 100% 99% 93% 71% 34% 7%
20 MOKRETSOV Leah 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 35%
21 GOFMAN Anastasia 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 15%
23 LIU sienna 100% 100% 95% 75% 41% 12% 1%
24 CHUNG Yenna 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 16% 2%
25 KIM Kate 100% 100% 99% 94% 68% 24%
26 GURTIN Sasha 100% 99% 93% 73% 40% 13% 2%
27 VENKATESH Uma 100% 95% 72% 38% 12% 2% -
28 ZHANG Aaliyah 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 26%
29 PATEL Agena 100% 99% 88% 59% 24% 4%
30 MEGGERS Arya 100% 100% 96% 76% 37% 7%
31 XIE ANDREA 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 48% 14%
32 ERATA Selena 100% 99% 88% 57% 20% 3% -
33 HAN Emma 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 24%
34 XU Yunshu 100% 98% 85% 57% 24% 5% -
35 HONG Catherine 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 21% 4%
36 YUSHCHENKO Ivanka 100% 100% 95% 79% 48% 16% 2%
37 ILYAS Daanya 100% 100% 97% 78% 42% 12% 1%
38 KIM Lina 100% 85% 50% 18% 4% - -
39 ZHAO Crystal 100% 100% 95% 76% 43% 15% 2%
40 MAO Faith 100% 100% 97% 79% 40% 10% 1%
41 CHOI Elina 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 20% 3%
42 FEESER Alexia 100% 98% 85% 54% 20% 3%
43 CHAN Faith Sum Yin 100% 98% 87% 58% 24% 5% -
44 ZHAO Ailsa 100% 83% 43% 12% 2% - -
45 ZHAO Sophia 100% 99% 90% 54% 16% 2% -
46 WANG Katherine 100% 98% 85% 55% 23% 5% -
47 HARSAR Cleo 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 22% 2%
48 KIM Abigail 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 21% 4%
49 KANDHI Aryaa 100% 99% 90% 65% 31% 8% 1%
50 STEWART Emily 100% 87% 49% 13% 2% -
51 WU Caroline 100% 73% 30% 6% - -
52 FAYEZ Malika 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 26%
53 SELASSIE Semara 100% 99% 90% 62% 26% 5% -
54 SHEN Sophia 100% 99% 87% 58% 25% 6% 1%
55 KUO Stella 100% 99% 89% 61% 28% 7% 1%
56 LEWIN Isabelle 100% 98% 88% 61% 28% 7% 1%
57 SALIBA Madison 100% 89% 56% 21% 4% -
58 WILLIAMS Valentina 100% 47% 11% 1% - - -
59 LEE Gloria 100% 100% 94% 68% 30% 7% 1%
59 CHEN Emily 100% 84% 48% 16% 3% -
61 MENG Yinuo 100% 88% 54% 20% 4% - -
62 LUO MAOSHUEN 100% 88% 50% 14% 2% -
63 LIU Sophie Wei 100% 77% 33% 6% 1% -
64 KAUR Harjas 100% 80% 42% 13% 2% - -
65 CHOI Serine 100% 82% 41% 9% 1% -
66 CHANEY Evelyn 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 20% 3%
67 VILLER Gabriella 100% 99% 92% 68% 32% 8% 1%
68 LIN Evelyn 100% 92% 57% 20% 4% - -
69 KIM Natalie 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 19% 2%
70 AINSWORTH Esme 100% 99% 92% 71% 37% 11% 1%
71 DARMAWAN Thea 100% 79% 39% 11% 2% - -
72 BONTHAPALLY Maitreyee S. 100% 96% 76% 38% 10% 1% -
73 YOON Michelle 100% 88% 54% 19% 4% -
73 CHEN Reina 100% 100% 99% 91% 60% 18%
75 SURENDAR Dhiya 100% 89% 55% 17% 2% -
76 CHOI Noah 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3%
77 LEE Zerah 100% 79% 39% 11% 2% -
78 WANG Jenny wang 100% 79% 39% 11% 2% - -
79 ZHENG Lina 100% 96% 78% 43% 13% 2%
80 KIM Brooke 100% 94% 70% 36% 11% 2% -
81 BIRZ Vivi 100% 75% 25% 4% - - -
82 CHO Angelina 100% 75% 25% 3% - - -
83 YULO Jamie 100% 53% 10% 1% - - -
84 BILIEN Yiwen 100% 97% 83% 51% 19% 4% -
85 KAUR Harman 100% 55% 12% 1% - - -
86 TANG Sophie 100% 85% 51% 19% 4% - -
87 BONDE Trisha 100% 82% 43% 13% 2% - -
88 JOSE EVA 100% 52% 13% 2% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.